Johnson v. Sandy et al

Filing 59

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/27/2014 ORDERING that defendants must file, no later than 9/2/2014, the privilege logs referenced in this order, and any other privilege log(s) relied on in response to those discovery requests that are at issue.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JOSEPH JOHNSON,

12

No. 2:12-cv-2922 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

E. SANDY, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

17
18

1983. Pending before the court are plaintiff’s motions to compel, ECF Nos. 34, 54, which have

19

been opposed by defendants. In opposition to the motion at ECF No. 54, defendants Cruzen,

20

Cobian, Lavagnino and Lavergne make reference to privilege logs that were provided to plaintiff

21

with certain of their discovery responses, i.e., Set One, Response to Request for Production (RFP)

22

No. 24 (propounded upon defendants Cobian, Cruzen, Lavagnino, and Lavergne) and Set Two,

23

Response to RFP No. 15 (propounded upon defendants Austin, Cobian, Cruzen, Destafano,

24

Hutcheson, Lahey, Lavagnino, Lavergne, Shadday and Swarthout). These privilege logs were not

25

provided to the court with defendants’ opposition.

26

////

27

////

28

////

1

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendants must file, no later than September 2, 2014,

2

the above-referenced privilege logs and any other privilege log(s) relied on in response to those

3

discovery requests that are at issue.

4

DATED: August 27, 2014

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2