Whitten v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al

Filing 51

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/27/14. At trial Plaintiff will not rely on expert testimony with regard to emotional distress claims. Defendants will not subpoena Plaintiff's medical records. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MARGARET HART EDWARDS, Bar No. 65699 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 ADRIANNE B. OSTROWSKI, Bar No. 238786 BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.830.7200 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND KEVIN MAILLOUX 10 11 12 13 14 GEORGE DUESDIEKER LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE DUESDIEKER 405 El Camino Real #107 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 566-9529 Attorney for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHYLLIS WHITTEN, 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ALLEGATIONS AND ORDER FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES CO., KEVIN MAILLOUX, and Doe 1 through Doe 10, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ALLEGATIONS AND ORDER Firmwide:128330729.2 064194.1023 1 2 3 4 Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., and KEVIN MAILLOUX and Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree through their respective counsel, as follows: 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. This stipulation is limited to Plaintiff’s claim for emotional distress damages against Defendants. At trial Plaintiff will not rely on the testimony of any retained or non-retained expert or treating healthcare provider, including, but not limited to, any physician, psychologist, psychiatrist, or any other healthcare provider, with regard to her claim for emotional distress damages With regard to emotional distress damages, Plaintiff will not testify at any time, nor will any witness called on her behalf testify, that any health care provider (including, but not limited to, the providers listed above), attributed any physical or mental health symptoms to Defendants’ alleged acts. 2. Defendants will not subpoena Plaintiff’s medical records from Dr. Suzanne Goldberg, 2029 Q Street NW, Washington, D.C. 20009. 16 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 18 19 DATED: August 7, 2014 /s/ George Duesdieker (as authorized on 08/07/14) GEORGE DUESDIEKER Law Office of George Duesdieker Attorneys for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN DATED: August 7, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. Blackburn _ MARGARET HART EDWARDS ADRIANNE B. OSTROWSKI BARBARA A. BLACKBURN Littler Mendelson, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND KEVIN MAILLOUX 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 2. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ALLEGATIONS AND ORDER Firmwide:128330729.2 064194.1023 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: August 27, 2014 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 3. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: PLAINTIFF’S EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ALLEGATIONS AND ORDER Firmwide:128330729.2 064194.1023

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?