Whitten v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al

Filing 54

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/24/14: Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 1/9/2015. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MARGARET HART EDWARDS, Bar No. 65699 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 ADRIANNE B. OSTROWSKI, Bar No. 238786 BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.830.7200 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND KEVIN MAILLOUX 10 11 12 13 14 GEORGE DUESDIEKER LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE DUESDIEKER 405 El Camino Real #107 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 566-9529 Attorney for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHYLLIS WHITTEN, 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES AND ORDER v. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES CO., KEVIN MAILLOUX, and Doe 1 through Doe 10, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY MOTION AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES AND ORDER Firmwide:129170528.1 064194.1023 1 2 3 4 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., and KEVIN MAILLOUX and Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree through their respective counsel, as follows: 5 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1. The parties have filed their Joint Statement pertaining to one of the discovery issues raised in the Court’s July 30, 2014 Order Granting Defendants’ Ex Parte Application for an Order Extending the Deadline for Defendants to File a Discovery Motion. Because of the Court’s schedule, they were unable to secure a hearing date with Magistrate Judge Brennan until October 29, 2014. 2. The parties would like the discovery issue raised in their Joint Statement resolved before they need to retain expert witnesses. Therefore, because of this October 29, 2014 hearing date and Defendants’ pending Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, the parties agree that the deadline to make expert witness disclosures should be extended to January 9, 2015 and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosures shall be made on or before February 13, 2015. 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 19 20 DATED: September 24, 2014 /s/ George Duesdieker (as authorized on 09/24/14) GEORGE DUESDIEKER Law Office of George Duesdieker Attorneys for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN DATED: September 24, 2014 /s/ Barbara A. Blackburn _ MARGARET HART EDWARDS ADRIANNE B. OSTROWSKI BARBARA A. BLACKBURN Littler Mendelson, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 2. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY MOTION AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES AND ORDER Firmwide:129170528.1 064194.1023 1 2 KEVIN MAILLOUX PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: September 24, 2014 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 3. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: DEFENDANTS’ DISCOVERY MOTION AND EXPERT WITNESS DISCLOSURES AND ORDER Firmwide:129170528.1 064194.1023

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?