Whitten v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al

Filing 56

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/7/14 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION to Compel 52 is DENIED. The parties are encouraged to meet and confer regarding a possible stipulation to extend the discovery deadline. The parties are reminded that any stipulation must be submitted to the assigned district judge for approval.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

PHYLLIS WHITTEN,

11
12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:12-cv-2926-TLN-EFB

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES CO.,
KEVIN MAILLOUX, and Doe 1 through
Doe 10,
Defendants.

17
18

On October 29, 2014, this case was before the court for hearing on defendants’ motion to

19

compel plaintiff to respond to defendants’ Inspection Demands Nos. 1, 2, and 3. ECF No. 52.

20

Attorney George Duesdieker appeared on behalf of plaintiff; attorney Barbara Blackburn

21

appeared on behalf of defendants. For the reasons stated on the record, defendants’ motion to

22

compel, ECF No. 52, is DENIED.

23

As discussed at the October 29 hearing, the parties are encouraged to meet and confer

24

regarding a possible stipulation to extend the discovery deadline. The parties are reminded that

25

any stipulation must be submitted to the assigned district judge for approval.

26
27
28

So Ordered.
DATED: November 7, 2014.