Whitten v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al

Filing 90

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/26/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's further motion in limine relating to the qualifications of defendant's expert with respect to compensation management shall be filed no later than 4/29/201 6 at 5 p.m. Defendant's opposition shall be filed no later than 5/6/2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff's reply shall be filed no later than 5/9/2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff's further motion in limine shall be heard with the other motions in limine set to be heard on 5/12/2016 at 1:30 p.m. (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 NANCY E. PRITIKIN, Bar No. 102392 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street, 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 Telephone: 415.433.1940 nepritikin@littler.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.830.7200 bblackburn@littler.com Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND KEVIN MAILLOUX GEORGE DUESDIEKER LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE DUESDIEKER 405 El Camino Real #107 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: (650) 566-9529 george@duesdieker.com Attorney for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 18 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PHYLLIS WHITTEN, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 Plaintiff, v. FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES CO., KEVIN MAILLOUX, and Doe 1 through Doe 10, Defendants. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED MOTION IN LIMINE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The deposition of Defendant’s expert (who is also serving as Defendant’s rebuttal expert) was taken on April 25, 2016; Defendant’s expert’s rebuttal report was served in a timely manner on April 18, 2016. In light of Defendant’s expert’s testimony on April 25, 2016, Plaintiff desires to file an additional motion in limine relating to the qualifications of defendant’s expert with respect to compensation management. Plaintiff’s view is that such a motion is consistent with the letter and spirit of STIPULATION RE: FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER AND ORDER (ECF 77, filed 3/31/2016) Defendant FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION and Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree through their respective counsel, as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: Plaintiff’s further motion in limine relating to the qualifications of defendant’s expert with respect to compensation management shall be filed no later than April 29, 2016 at 5 p.m. Defendant’s opposition shall be filed no later than May 6, 2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff’s reply shall be filed no later than May 9, 2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff’s further motion in limine shall be heard with the other motions in limine set to be heard on May 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. 17 18 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 19 20 DATED: April 26, 2016 /s/ George Duesdieker_______________________ GEORGE DUESDIEKER Law Office of George Duesdieker Attorneys for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN DATED: April 26, 2016 /s/ BB or NP (as authorized on 4/ /16) NANCY E. PRITIKIN BARBARA A. BLACKBURN LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND KEVIN MAILLOUX 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 2. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: MOTION IN LIMINE ORDER 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 5 Dated: April 26, 2016 6 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 650 California Street 20th Floor San Francisco, CA 94108.2693 415.433.1940 3. Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB STIPULATION RE: MOTION IN LIMINE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?