Whitten v. Frontier Communications Corporation et al
Filing
90
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/26/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's further motion in limine relating to the qualifications of defendant's expert with respect to compensation management shall be filed no later than 4/29/201 6 at 5 p.m. Defendant's opposition shall be filed no later than 5/6/2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff's reply shall be filed no later than 5/9/2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff's further motion in limine shall be heard with the other motions in limine set to be heard on 5/12/2016 at 1:30 p.m. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
NANCY E. PRITIKIN, Bar No. 102392
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street, 20th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94108.2693
Telephone:
415.433.1940
nepritikin@littler.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
BARBARA A. BLACKBURN, Bar No. 253731
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916.830.7200
bblackburn@littler.com
Attorneys for Defendants
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION, CITIZENS TELECOM
SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND KEVIN
MAILLOUX
GEORGE DUESDIEKER
LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE DUESDIEKER
405 El Camino Real #107
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
(650) 566-9529
george@duesdieker.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
PHYLLIS WHITTEN
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
18
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PHYLLIS WHITTEN,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94108.2693
415.433.1940
Plaintiff,
v.
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation,
CITIZENS TELECOM SERVICES CO.,
KEVIN MAILLOUX, and Doe 1 through
Doe 10,
Defendants.
Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE:
PLAINTIFF’S PROPOSED MOTION IN
LIMINE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
The deposition of Defendant’s expert (who is also serving as Defendant’s rebuttal
expert) was taken on April 25, 2016; Defendant’s expert’s rebuttal report was served in a timely
manner on April 18, 2016. In light of Defendant’s expert’s testimony on April 25, 2016, Plaintiff
desires to file an additional motion in limine relating to the qualifications of defendant’s expert with
respect to compensation management. Plaintiff’s view is that such a motion is consistent with the
letter and spirit of STIPULATION RE: FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER AND ORDER (ECF 77, filed
3/31/2016)
Defendant FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION and Plaintiff
PHYLLIS WHITTEN, subject to the approval of the Court, hereby stipulate and agree through their
respective counsel, as follows:
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT:
Plaintiff’s further motion in limine relating to the qualifications of defendant’s expert
with respect to compensation management shall be filed no later than April 29, 2016 at 5 p.m.
Defendant’s opposition shall be filed no later than May 6, 2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff’s reply shall be
filed no later than May 9, 2016 at 5 p.m. Plaintiff’s further motion in limine shall be heard with the
other motions in limine set to be heard on May 12, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
17
18
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
19
20
DATED: April 26, 2016
/s/ George Duesdieker_______________________
GEORGE DUESDIEKER
Law Office of George Duesdieker
Attorneys for Plaintiff PHYLLIS WHITTEN
DATED: April 26, 2016
/s/ BB or NP (as authorized on 4/ /16)
NANCY E. PRITIKIN
BARBARA A. BLACKBURN
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendants FRONTIER
COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, CITIZENS
TELECOM SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C., AND
KEVIN MAILLOUX
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94108.2693
415.433.1940
2.
Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB
STIPULATION RE: MOTION IN LIMINE ORDER
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: April 26, 2016
6
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
650 California Street
20th Floor
San Francisco, CA
94108.2693
415.433.1940
3.
Case No. 2:12−CV−02926−TLN−EFB
STIPULATION RE: MOTION IN LIMINE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?