Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Taylor Morrison of California, LLC et al
Filing
31
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/25/2014 ORDERING that the Complaint against Taylor Morrison is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. The Counterclaim against Travelers is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
A. Eric Aguilera, Esq. (SBN 192390)
Kimberly R. Arnal, Esq. (SBN 200448)
650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
T: 714.384.6600 / F: 714.384.6601
eaguilera@aguileragroup.com
karnal@aguileragroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF
CONNECTICUT and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF
AMERICA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a
Connecticut corporation, TRAVELERS
PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation
16
STIPULATION TO
VOLUNTARILY DISMISS
ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP
RULE 41; ORDER
Plaintiff,
17
Case No. 2:12-cv-02933-TLN-CKD
[Hon. Troy L. Nunley]
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
TAYLOR MORRISON OF
CALIFORNIA, LLC, a California
limited liability company; TAYLOR
MORRISON SERVICES, INC., a
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
through 10 inclusive,
Defendant.
TAYLOR MORRISON OF
CALIFORNIA, LLC, a California
limited liability company; TAYLOR
MORRISON SERVICES, INC., a
Delaware corporation; and DOES 1
through 10 inclusive,
27
Counterclaimants,
28
vs.
1
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER
1
2
3
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a
Connecticut corporation, TRAVELERS
PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
OF AMERICA, a Connecticut
corporation,
4
Counterdefendants.
5
6
7
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and
8
Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (collectively “Travelers”) and
9
Defendants Taylor Morrison of California LLC, and Taylor Morrison Services, Inc.
10
(collectively “Taylor Morrison”) have reached a settlement;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Travelers wish to dismiss, with prejudice, their
11
12
Complaint against defendants Taylor Morrison in the present action.
WHEREAS, Defendants Taylor Morrison wish to dismiss, with prejudice,
13
14
their Counterclaim against plaintiffs Travelers in the present action.
15
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN
16
Travelers and Taylor Morrison, by and through their designated counsel, that the
17
Complaint against Taylor Morrison be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice from
18
the above-entitled action pursuant to FRCP 41.
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN
20
Taylor Morrison and Travelers, by and through their designated counsel, that the
21
Counterclaim against Travelers be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice from the
22
above-entitled action pursuant to FRCP 41.
Travelers and Taylor Morrison further agree to waive any claim for costs they
23
24
might have against each other associated with the present action.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
2
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER
1
Dated: November 25, 2014
THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC
2
3
By: __/s/ Kimberly R. Arnal__
4
A. Eric Aguilera, Esq.
Kimberly R. Arnal, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Travelers Property
Casualty Company of America and Travelers
Indemnity Company of Connecticut
5
6
7
8
9
10
Dated: November 25, 2014
COX CASTLE NICHOLSON LLP
11
12
By: _/s/ John R. Musitano, Jr.
13
John R. Musitano, Jr., Esq.
Attorney for Defendants and Counterclaimants
Taylor Morrison of California LLC and Taylor
Morrison Services, Inc.
14
15
16
17
18
ORDER
19
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED,
21
22
23
Dated: November 25, 2014
24
25
26
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?