Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Taylor Morrison of California, LLC et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/25/2014 ORDERING that the Complaint against Taylor Morrison is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. The Counterclaim against Travelers is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC A. Eric Aguilera, Esq. (SBN 192390) Kimberly R. Arnal, Esq. (SBN 200448) 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 T: 714.384.6600 / F: 714.384.6601 eaguilera@aguileragroup.com karnal@aguileragroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation 16 STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER Plaintiff, 17 Case No. 2:12-cv-02933-TLN-CKD [Hon. Troy L. Nunley] v. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, a California limited liability company; TAYLOR MORRISON SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, Defendant. TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, a California limited liability company; TAYLOR MORRISON SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10 inclusive, 27 Counterclaimants, 28 vs. 1 STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER 1 2 3 TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation, TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, 4 Counterdefendants. 5 6 7 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and 8 Travelers Property Casualty Company of America (collectively “Travelers”) and 9 Defendants Taylor Morrison of California LLC, and Taylor Morrison Services, Inc. 10 (collectively “Taylor Morrison”) have reached a settlement; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Travelers wish to dismiss, with prejudice, their 11 12 Complaint against defendants Taylor Morrison in the present action. WHEREAS, Defendants Taylor Morrison wish to dismiss, with prejudice, 13 14 their Counterclaim against plaintiffs Travelers in the present action. 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN 16 Travelers and Taylor Morrison, by and through their designated counsel, that the 17 Complaint against Taylor Morrison be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice from 18 the above-entitled action pursuant to FRCP 41. 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED BY AND BETWEEN 20 Taylor Morrison and Travelers, by and through their designated counsel, that the 21 Counterclaim against Travelers be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice from the 22 above-entitled action pursuant to FRCP 41. Travelers and Taylor Morrison further agree to waive any claim for costs they 23 24 might have against each other associated with the present action. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER 1 Dated: November 25, 2014 THE AGUILERA LAW GROUP, APLC 2 3 By: __/s/ Kimberly R. Arnal__ 4 A. Eric Aguilera, Esq. Kimberly R. Arnal, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut 5 6 7 8 9 10 Dated: November 25, 2014 COX CASTLE NICHOLSON LLP 11 12 By: _/s/ John R. Musitano, Jr. 13 John R. Musitano, Jr., Esq. Attorney for Defendants and Counterclaimants Taylor Morrison of California LLC and Taylor Morrison Services, Inc. 14 15 16 17 18 ORDER 19 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, 21 22 23 Dated: November 25, 2014 24 25 26 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION UNDER FRCP RULE 41; ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?