Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick et al
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/7/14. The parties are ordered to discontinue their email communications with the courtroom deputy regarding the substance of their discovery dispute. Counsel for defendants is ordered to send a courtesy copy of this order via email to plaintiff upon receipt. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL J. FITZPATRICK,
12
13
No. 2:12-cv-02938 GEB AC PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
14
BRIAN FITZPATRICK, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff Michael Fitzpatrick, who proceeds pro se, has recently sent repeated email
18
communications to the Courtroom Deputy Clerk for the undersigned magistrate judge, seeking
19
intervention and/or assistance regarding ongoing discovery disputes. Mr. Fitzpatrick represents
20
that a motion to compel discovery has been mailed to the court for filing. He appears to seek an
21
“emergency” informal telephonic discovery conference, although opposing counsel has not
22
agreed to submit to that process. Depositions of the parties have been ordered to take place
23
between November 15 and November 20, 2014. ECF No. 73. Discovery remains open until
24
February 25, 2015, and motions to compel discovery must be heard no later than February 4,
25
2015. ECF No. 72. Because plaintiff professes confusion about the rules, the following
26
clarification is provided.
27
28
Motions to compel discovery are governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a) and Local Rule 251.
The moving party must file a motion that functions to notify the court of the dispute and place the
1
1
matter on calendar, but that does not include Points and Authorities (argument). There is no
2
responsive briefing on a discovery motion. Instead, with only limited exceptions, the parties are
3
required to file a single document: a Joint Statement regarding the discovery dispute, containing
4
the positions of both parties. It is the moving party’s obligation to draft and file the Joint
5
Statement, incorporating the contributions of the other parties. The requirements for the Joint
6
Statement are set out in the Local Rule. Any separate briefing is unauthorized and will be
7
disregarded.
8
As an alternative to this formal motion process, the undersigned offers a procedure for
9
resolving discovery disputes by informal telephonic conference. The procedures for obtaining
10
such a conference are set forth in the document titled “Informal Telephone Conference re
11
Discovery Disputes,” which is posted on the undersigned’s page of the court’s website. An
12
informal telephonic conference is available only when the party seeking discovery first obtains
13
the agreement of the other party to utilize this procedure, and then contacts the courtroom deputy
14
with dates and times when all parties are available for a conference. Unless all parties agree that
15
this method is appropriate for resolution of their dispute, the prospective moving party may not
16
avail himself of the informal process.
17
18
Because Mr. Fitzgerald has not represented that the parties jointly seek an informal
telephonic discovery conference, none will be scheduled.
19
The court will review the anticipated motion to compel in due course.
20
All previously-ordered deadlines remain in place.
21
The parties are HEREBY ORDERED to discontinue their email communications with the
22
courtroom deputy regarding the substance of their discovery dispute. The courtroom deputy is
23
the appropriate person to contact regarding the court’s calendar, arrangements for telephonic
24
appearance at hearings, and to schedule an informal telephonic conference if all interested parties
25
have agreed to that process. She cannot provide legal advice, including information about how to
26
comply with the Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. She will not relay any
27
information regarding the discovery dispute to the undersigned. Communication with the court
28
off the record, including attempts to communicate with the judge via the courtroom deputy, is
2
1
improper. With the sole exception of the joint letter authorized in relationship to an informal
2
telephonic discovery conference, any information the parties wish to present to the court must be
3
presented in filed documents. The courtroom deputy has been directed not to respond to further
4
communications regarding matters outside the scope of her duties.
5
Because plaintiff is not an electronic filer and is presently out of the country, and because
6
time is of the essence given the deposition schedule, counsel for defendants is HEREBY
7
ORDERED to send a courtesy copy of this order via email to plaintiff upon receipt.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 7, 2014
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?