Trujillo et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/11/14 ORDERING for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that Paragraph VI of this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, dated 8/27/13, is amended to extend the dispositi ve motion hearing date from 10/2/14 to 10/30/14; The briefing schedule set out in Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain in effect as follows: Dispositive motion filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing; Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing; Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing; Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing.(Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER Richard H. Schoenberger, SBN: 122190 2 Spencer J. Pahlke, SBN: 250914 650 California Street, 26th Floor 3 San Francisco, CA 94108 Telephone: (415) 981-7210 4 Facsimile: (415) 391-6965 Email: rschoenberger@walkuplawoffice.com 5 MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP 115 WARD STREET LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939 6 MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP Barron L. Weinstein, SBN: 067972 7 115 Ward Street Larkspur, CA 94939 8 Telephone: (415) 927-6920 Facsimile: (415) 927-6929 9 Email: bweinstein@mwncov.com 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo, 11 and Gregory Trujillo 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo, and Gregory Trujillo, 15 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE FROM OCTOBER 2, 2014 TO OCTOBER 30, 2014; 18 Nationwide Insurance Company of America, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, 19 Nationwide Sales Solutions, Inc., and DOES 150, Inclusive, 20 ORDER 21 TRIAL DATE: February 9, 2015 Defendants. JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. COMPLAINT FILED: December 7, 2012 22 23 24 Plaintiffs Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo, and Gregory Trujillo, and Defendants 25 Nationwide Insurance Company of America, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, through 26 their respective counsel, hereby submit this STIPULATION and JOINT APPLICATION to 27 Continue the Dispositive Motion Hearing Date from October 2, 2014 To October 30, 2014. 28 1 STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND ORDER Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK The Parties have exchanged Initial Disclosures and written discovery, and have completed 1 2 the depositions of critical witnesses. The Parties believe that this case is now at a point where 3 settlement discussions will be beneficial. Therefore, the Parties have agreed to participate in private mediation at this time. In order 4 5 to accommodate summer scheduling conflicts and mediator availability, the Parties have agreed 6 that the mediation be completed by the end of August. Per Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order, dispositive motions are currently due on 7 8 or before August 7, 2014, which is 8 weeks before the October 2nd hearing date. The Parties believe that it will be an inefficient use of time and resources, as well as 9 MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP 115 WARD STREET LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939 10 counterproductive to the mediation, to prepare dispositive motions simultaneously with settlement 11 discussions. Based on the foregoing, and the Declaration of Barron L. Weinstein, counsel for Plaintiffs, 12 13 filed concurrently herewith, the Parties STIPULATE and respectfully JOINTLY REQUEST that 14 the Court extend the dispositive motion hearing date 28 days, from October 2, 2014 to October 30, 15 2014. 16 This extension of four weeks will not interfere with or affect any other dates in the Pretrial 17 Scheduling Order, including the pretrial conference and trial dates. 18 The briefing schedule set out in Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain 19 in effect as follows: 20 Dispositive motion filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing. 21 Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing. 22 Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing. 23 Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing. 24 25 Respectfully Submitted, 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND ORDER Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK 1 2 DATED: July 3, 2014 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN, LLP 3 By: 4 5 /s/ Allan S. Cohen Attorney for Defendants Nationwide Insurance Company of America, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, And Nationwide Sales Solutions, Inc., 6 7 8 9 MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP 115 WARD STREET LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939 10 DATED: July 3, 2014 MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP 11 12 13 14 By: /s/ Barron L. Weinstein Attorney for Plaintiffs Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo, and Gregory Trujillo 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND ORDER Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK 1 2 ORDER For good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that Paragraph VI of this Court’s Pretrial 3 Scheduling Order, dated August 27, 2013, is amended to extend the dispositive motion hearing 4 date from October 2, 2014 to October 30, 2014. 5 The briefing schedule set out in Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain 6 in effect as follows: 7 Dispositive motion filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing. 8 Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing. 9 Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing. MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP 115 WARD STREET LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939 10 Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 Dated: July 11, 2014 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND ORDER Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?