Trujillo et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/11/14 ORDERING for good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that Paragraph VI of this Court's Pretrial Scheduling Order, dated 8/27/13, is amended to extend the dispositi ve motion hearing date from 10/2/14 to 10/30/14; The briefing schedule set out in Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain in effect as follows: Dispositive motion filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing; Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing; Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing; Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing.(Becknal, R)
1 WALKUP, MELODIA, KELLY & SCHOENBERGER
Richard H. Schoenberger, SBN: 122190
2 Spencer J. Pahlke, SBN: 250914
650 California Street, 26th Floor
3 San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: (415) 981-7210
4 Facsimile: (415) 391-6965
Email: rschoenberger@walkuplawoffice.com
5
MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP
115 WARD STREET
LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939
6 MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP
Barron L. Weinstein, SBN: 067972
7 115 Ward Street
Larkspur, CA 94939
8 Telephone: (415) 927-6920
Facsimile: (415) 927-6929
9 Email: bweinstein@mwncov.com
10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo,
11 and Gregory Trujillo
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14 Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo, and Gregory
Trujillo,
15
16
Plaintiffs,
17 v.
CASE NO.: 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK
STIPULATION AND JOINT
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING
DATE FROM OCTOBER 2, 2014 TO
OCTOBER 30, 2014;
18 Nationwide Insurance Company of America,
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,
19 Nationwide Sales Solutions, Inc., and DOES 150, Inclusive,
20
ORDER
21
TRIAL DATE: February 9, 2015
Defendants.
JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.
COMPLAINT FILED: December 7, 2012
22
23
24
Plaintiffs Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo, and Gregory Trujillo, and Defendants
25 Nationwide Insurance Company of America, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, through
26 their respective counsel, hereby submit this STIPULATION and JOINT APPLICATION to
27 Continue the Dispositive Motion Hearing Date from October 2, 2014 To October 30, 2014.
28
1
STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND
ORDER
Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK
The Parties have exchanged Initial Disclosures and written discovery, and have completed
1
2 the depositions of critical witnesses. The Parties believe that this case is now at a point where
3 settlement discussions will be beneficial.
Therefore, the Parties have agreed to participate in private mediation at this time. In order
4
5 to accommodate summer scheduling conflicts and mediator availability, the Parties have agreed
6 that the mediation be completed by the end of August.
Per Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order, dispositive motions are currently due on
7
8 or before August 7, 2014, which is 8 weeks before the October 2nd hearing date.
The Parties believe that it will be an inefficient use of time and resources, as well as
9
MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP
115 WARD STREET
LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939
10 counterproductive to the mediation, to prepare dispositive motions simultaneously with settlement
11 discussions.
Based on the foregoing, and the Declaration of Barron L. Weinstein, counsel for Plaintiffs,
12
13 filed concurrently herewith, the Parties STIPULATE and respectfully JOINTLY REQUEST that
14 the Court extend the dispositive motion hearing date 28 days, from October 2, 2014 to October 30,
15 2014.
16
This extension of four weeks will not interfere with or affect any other dates in the Pretrial
17 Scheduling Order, including the pretrial conference and trial dates.
18
The briefing schedule set out in Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain
19 in effect as follows:
20
Dispositive motion filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing.
21
Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing.
22
Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing.
23
Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing.
24
25
Respectfully Submitted,
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND
ORDER
Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK
1
2
DATED: July 3, 2014
STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN, LLP
3
By:
4
5
/s/
Allan S. Cohen
Attorney for Defendants
Nationwide Insurance Company of America,
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company,
And Nationwide Sales Solutions, Inc.,
6
7
8
9
MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP
115 WARD STREET
LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939
10
DATED: July 3, 2014
MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP
11
12
13
14
By:
/s/
Barron L. Weinstein
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Pascual Trujillo, Leticia Trujillo,
and Gregory Trujillo
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND
ORDER
Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK
1
2
ORDER
For good cause shown, it is hereby ordered that Paragraph VI of this Court’s Pretrial
3 Scheduling Order, dated August 27, 2013, is amended to extend the dispositive motion hearing
4 date from October 2, 2014 to October 30, 2014.
5
The briefing schedule set out in Paragraph VI of the Pretrial Scheduling Order will remain
6 in effect as follows:
7
Dispositive motion filed at least 8 weeks prior to hearing.
8
Opposition and any cross-motion filed at least 5 weeks prior to hearing.
9
Reply and opposition to cross-motion filed at least 3 weeks prior to hearing.
MEREDITH, WEINSTEIN & NUMBERS, LLP
115 WARD STREET
LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA 94939
10
Reply to cross-motion filed at least 1 week prior to hearing.
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
Dated: July 11, 2014
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION AND JOINT APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DISPOSITIVE MOTION HEARING DATE AND
ORDER
Case No. 2:12-CV-02958 MCE CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?