Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al

Filing 117

ORDER vacating the 4/18/2013 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF No. 71 and 72) and continuing the Motions for oral argument to 4/22/2013 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7. Plaintiffs' 4/18/2013 Motion to Recuse (ECF No. 102) is vacated and will be reset if necessary. (Deutsch, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES GRINOLS, et. al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 v. No. 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD ORDER ELECTORAL COLLEGE, et. al.,, 15 Defendants. 16 Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the Court will hear oral argument regarding both 17 18 California Defendants’ and Federal Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss on April 22, 2013 at 19 10:00 am in Courtroom 7. (ECF No. 71 and 73.) The Court will allot each party-- 20 Plaintiffs, California Defendants, and Federal Defendants--a maximum of 30 minutes of 21 oral argument. Oral argument will be limited to: (1) mootness, (2) standing, (3) political 22 question doctrine, (4) the Speech and Debate Clause, and/or (5) service of process on 23 defendants. No witnesses and/or exhibits will be permitted or considered at the hearing. 24 Plaintiffs’ “Motion to Recuse Counsel for Defendants and Motion to Expedite under Local 25 Rule 144” (ECF No. 102) currently set for April 18, 2013 is VACATED in light of the 26 hearing on the motions to dismiss. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 3 A new hearing date will be set for said motion if necessary. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 4, 2013 4 5 6 _______________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?