Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/17/2013 ORDERING that Defendant's 27 Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Time for Responding to Plaintiffs' Subpoenas is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to modify their subpoenas in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, allowing Defendants a reasonable amount of time to comply. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES GRINOLS, et al.,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD
ORDER
v.
ELECTORAL COLLEGE et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
On December 27, 2012, Defendants filed an Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Time
18
19
for Responding to Plaintiffs’ Subpoenas. (ECF No. 27) Prior to the January 3, 2013
20
hearing, Plaintiffs filed several subpoenas. (ECF Nos. 15-24) Plaintiffs filed their
21
subpoenas on Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and the day after Christmas. Id. In all but
22
one subpoena, Plaintiffs requested documents within a week. Id. A-one week response
23
time would be unreasonable at any time during the year, but such a quick turnaround is
24
especially unreasonable during the final weeks of the calendar year. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs are ordered to modify
their subpoenas in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, allowing Defendants a
reasonable amount of time to comply.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: January 17, 2013
7
________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
DEAC_Signature-END:
11
12
13
c4d6b0d3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?