Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/17/2013 ORDERING that Defendant's 27 Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Time for Responding to Plaintiffs' Subpoenas is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are ORDERED to modify their subpoenas in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, allowing Defendants a reasonable amount of time to comply. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES GRINOLS, et al., 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 No. 12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD ORDER v. ELECTORAL COLLEGE et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On December 27, 2012, Defendants filed an Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Time 18 19 for Responding to Plaintiffs’ Subpoenas. (ECF No. 27) Prior to the January 3, 2013 20 hearing, Plaintiffs filed several subpoenas. (ECF Nos. 15-24) Plaintiffs filed their 21 subpoenas on Christmas Eve, Christmas Day and the day after Christmas. Id. In all but 22 one subpoena, Plaintiffs requested documents within a week. Id. A-one week response 23 time would be unreasonable at any time during the year, but such a quick turnaround is 24 especially unreasonable during the final weeks of the calendar year. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 2 3 Accordingly, Defendants’ motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs are ordered to modify their subpoenas in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, allowing Defendants a reasonable amount of time to comply. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: January 17, 2013 7 ________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 10 DEAC_Signature-END: 11 12 13 c4d6b0d3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?