Haas Bros LLC v. Eht Lozaro, et al

Filing 5

ORDER adopting in full 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/18/13. This action is summarily remanded to the San Joaquin County Superior Court; and this case is CLOSED. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

HAAS BROS LLC,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13

Case No. 2:12-cv-3003 JAM DAD PS

vs.
EHT LOZARO;
YOLANDA LOZARO,

ORDER

14
15

Defendants.

16

/

17
18

Defendants are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

19

On December 18, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

20

herein which were served on defendants and which contained notice that any objections to the

21

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings

22

and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and defendants have not filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

26

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 18, 2012 (Doc. No. 4) are

3

adopted in full;

4
5
6
7

2. This action is summarily remanded to the San Joaquin County Superior Court;
and
3. This case is closed.
DATED: March 18, 2013

8

/s/ John A. Mendez

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2