Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. Salazar et al

Filing 112

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 7/7/14 ORDERING that Defendants' MOTION for leave 110 is GRANTED, and the Court grants Defendants' leave to file a consolidated memorandum, in opposition to Plaintiffs' three Motions for Summary Judgment and in support of Defendants' Cross-MOTION for Summary Judgment, not to exceed fifty (50) pages. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

SAM HIRSCH
Assistant Attorney General
PETER KRYN DYKEMA
STEVEN E. MISKINIS
United States Department of Justice
Environment and Natural Resources Division
P.O. Box 663
Washington, D.C. 20044
[phone]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED AUBURN INDIANCOMMUNITY
OF THE AUBURN RANCHERIA,

)
)
)
Plaintiff
)
v.
)
)
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, et al.
)
)
Defendants
)
__________________________________________)
)
CITIZENS FOR A BETTER WAY, et al.
)
)
Plaintiffs
)
v.
)
)
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
)
INTERIOR, et al.,
)
Defendants
)
__________________________________________)
)
CACHIL DEHE BAND OF WINTUN INDIANS )
OF THE COLUSA INDIAN COMMUNITY,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, et al.,
)
)
Defendants
)

Civil Action No. 2:12-CV-3021-TLN-AC
(Consolidated)

ORDER ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED
PAGE LIMITS

1
2
3

Defendants have moved the Court for an order permitting defendants to file a memorandum
of law up to fifty (50) pages in length.
In this consolidated proceeding, each of the three plaintiffs filed a motion for summary

4

judgment on June 24, as provided in the Court’s stipulated scheduling Order (ECF 95).

5

Defendants’ consolidated memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs’ motions and in support of

6

defendants’ own motion for summary judgment is due July 24. This Court’s Case Management

7

Procedures establish “a page limit on dispositive motions of twenty (20) pages on all initial

8

moving papers, twenty (20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies,” and further

9

provide that “[a]ny party wishing to file lengthier documents must first seek relief from said page

10
11

limitation requirement from the Court.”
For the reasons set forth in defendants’ motion, that motion is GRANTED, and the Court

12

grants defendants leave to file a consolidated memorandum, in opposition to plaintiffs’ three

13

motions for summary judgment and in support of defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment,

14

not to exceed fifty (50) pages.

15
16

Dated: July 7, 2014

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge