Rose v. Barnes

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/12/2013 DENYING petitioner's 15 , 16 requests. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WAYNE LAVERNE ROSE, 12 Petitioner, 13 v. 14 No. 2:12-cv-3028-EFB P R.E. BARNES, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 18 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner commenced this action by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus 19 on December 17, 2012. ECF No. 1. The petition raises seven claims for relief. Id. On May 30, 20 2013, respondent addressed the merits of those claims in a responsive pleading. ECF No. 14. 21 Petitioner then filed a “motion to stay” in order to “exhaust unexhausted claims” without 22 specifying which of his claims he believes are unexhausted. ECF No. 15. Because he has not 23 provided sufficient information concerning the claims he wishes to exhaust, the court cannot 24 determine any basis for issuing a stay, and the motion is denied without prejudice. Petitioner also 25 requested to attach a letter from a San Joaquin County deputy public defender to his petition. 26 ECF No. 16. That request is denied as unnecessary, as respondent made the letter a part of the 27 record through Lodged Document No. 9, and discussed the letter in the responsive pleading. See 28 ECF No. 14 at 27; ECF No. 17. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s requests (ECF Nos. 15, 16) are 2 denied. 3 Dated: December 12, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?