Rose v. Barnes
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/12/2013 DENYING petitioner's 15 , 16 requests. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WAYNE LAVERNE ROSE,
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
No. 2:12-cv-3028-EFB P
R.E. BARNES,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to
18
28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner commenced this action by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus
19
on December 17, 2012. ECF No. 1. The petition raises seven claims for relief. Id. On May 30,
20
2013, respondent addressed the merits of those claims in a responsive pleading. ECF No. 14.
21
Petitioner then filed a “motion to stay” in order to “exhaust unexhausted claims” without
22
specifying which of his claims he believes are unexhausted. ECF No. 15. Because he has not
23
provided sufficient information concerning the claims he wishes to exhaust, the court cannot
24
determine any basis for issuing a stay, and the motion is denied without prejudice. Petitioner also
25
requested to attach a letter from a San Joaquin County deputy public defender to his petition.
26
ECF No. 16. That request is denied as unnecessary, as respondent made the letter a part of the
27
record through Lodged Document No. 9, and discussed the letter in the responsive pleading. See
28
ECF No. 14 at 27; ECF No. 17.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s requests (ECF Nos. 15, 16) are
2
denied.
3
Dated: December 12, 2013.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?