Sehic v. Anderson et al

Filing 3

ORDER STTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/22/13: Initial Scheduling Conference set for 3/29/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. Plaintiff shall file and serve his own separate status report on or before 3/15/13 and each defendant shall file and serve their own separate status report on or before 3/22/13. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMIR SEHIC, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:12-cv-3030 WBS DAD PS vs. WILLIAM VAN ANDERSON; MAYUKA S ANDERSON, ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE 14 15 Defendants 16 / 17 This action was transferred from the Middle District of Alabama to this court on 18 December 17, 2012. Plaintiff Emir Sehic, defendant William Van Anderson and defendant 19 Mayuka S. Anderson are proceeding pro se. The action has therefore been referred to the 20 undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) for all purposes encompassed by that rule. 21 22 Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, IT IS ORDERED that: 23 1. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Friday, March 29, 2013, 24 at 10:00 a.m., at the United States District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California, in 25 Courtroom No. 27, before the undersigned. 26 ///// 1 1 2. Each party is required to appear at the Status Conference, either by counsel or, 2 if proceeding in propria persona, on his own behalf. Any party may appear at the status 3 conference telephonically if the party pre-arranges such appearance by contacting Pete Buzo, the 4 courtroom deputy of the undersigned magistrate judge, at (916) 930-4128, no later than 48 hours 5 before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference; a land line telephone number must be 6 provided. 7 3. Plaintiff shall file and serve his own separate status report on or before March 8 15, 2013, and each defendant shall file and serve their own separate status report on or before 9 March 22, 2013. Each party’s status report shall address all of the following matters: 10 a. Progress of service of process; 11 b. Possible joinder of additional parties; 12 c. Possible amendment of the pleadings; 13 d. Jurisdiction and venue; 14 e. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof; 15 f. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof, including disclosure of expert witnesses; g. Future proceedings, including the setting of appropriate cut-off dates for discovery and for law and motion, and the scheduling of a final pretrial conference and trial; h. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the relative simplicity or complexity of the action; i. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in bankruptcy; j. Whether the parties will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this matter acting as settlement judge, waiving any disqualification by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference before another magistrate judge; k. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 1 2 United States Magistrate Judge; and l. Any other matters that may aid in the just and expeditious disposition of this action. 3 4 4. The parties are cautioned that failure to file a status report or failure to appear 5 at the status conference may result in an order imposing an appropriate sanction. See Local 6 Rules 110 and 183. 7 DATED: January 22, 2013. 8 9 10 11 12 DAD:6 Ddad1\orders.pro se\sehic3030.ossc 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?