McKeen-Chaplin v. Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Filing
116
ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/1/2017 DENYING as MOOT #111 Motion to Vacate. (Washington, S)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
5
6
GINA MCKEEN-CHAPLIN,
individually, on behalf of
others similarly situated,
and on behalf of the general
public,
7
ORDER
Plaintiffs,
8
9
No. 2:12-cv-03035-GEB-AC
v.
PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB,
10
Defendant.
11
12
On July 19, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion to vacate
13
Defendant’s costs taxed against Plaintiffs in light of the Ninth
14
Circuit’s ruling in Plaintiffs’ favor.
15
Circuit’s mandate concerning the referenced reversal issued on
16
July
17
Circuit’s opinion and mandate, the district court filed an “Order
18
Concerning
19
judgment
20
judgment in favor of Plaintiffs.
21
favor of defendant has been reversed, costs previously awarded to
22
the Defendant as the prevailing party are automatically vacated.
23
See In re Smith, 876 F.2d 524, 527 (6th Cir. 1989) (“[W]hen a
24
judgment is reversed on appeal, any taxation of costs is also
25
automatically vacated.”); Furman v. Cirrito, 782 F.2d 353, 355
26
(2d Cir. 1986) (“When a district court judgment is reversed . . .
27
on appeal, any costs awarded to the previously prevailing party
28
are
27,
2017.
ECF
Judgments”
entered
automatically
in
No. 113.
on
In
July
favor
31,
of
vacated.”);
ECF No. 111.
accordance
2017,
Defendant
ECF No. 114.
10 Alan
1
with
vacating
and
Wright
The Ninth
the
a
entering
Ninth
previous
summary
Since judgment in
et
al.,
Federal
1
Practice and Procedure § 2668, Westlaw (database updated Apr.
2
2017) (“When a judgment is reversed or substantially modified on
3
appeal,
4
Therefore, Plaintiffs’ July 19, 2017 motion to vacate Defendant’s
5
costs taxed against Plaintiffs is DENIED as moot.
6
Dated:
the
taxation
of
costs
August 1, 2017
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
automatically
is
vacated.”).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?