McKeen-Chaplin v. Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.
Filing
137
ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 12/29/18 ORDERING this case DISMISSED with each party to bear its own fees and costs. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Matthew C. Helland, CA State Bar No. 250451
Helland@nka.com
Daniel S. Brome, CA State Bar No. 278915
dbrome@nka.com
NICHOLS KASTER, LLP
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 810
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 277-7235
Facsimile: (415) 277-7238
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
BLANK ROME LLP
Howard M. Knee, Esq. (SBN 55048)
knee@blankrome.com
Michael L. Ludwig, Esq. (SBN 173850)
ludwig@blankrome.com
Caitlin I. Sanders (SBN 294143)
csanders@blankrome.com
2029 Century Park East, 6th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (424) 239-3400
Facsimile: (424) 239-3434
Attorneys for Defendant
PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
GINA MCKEEN-CHAPLIN, individually, on
behalf of all others similarly situated, and on
behalf of the general public,
Plaintiffs,
20
21
22
23
v.
Case No.: 2:12-cv-03035-MCE-AC
JOINT REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL
FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); ORDER
PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB,
Defendant.
24
25
26
27
28
`
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
1
The Superior Court for Alameda County granted final settlement approval to the state law
2
class action settlement in Neal v. Provident Savings Bank, FSB by order dated November 13, 2018,
3
and served on November 20, 2018. A copy of the Neal Final Approval Order is attached hereto as
4
Exhibit 1. Because the Neal court granted final approval without substantive modification, this
5
case may be closed. In light of the final settlement approval in Neal, and this Court’s previous
6
grant of settlement approval, the parties now stipulate that this action may be dismissed.
7
Therefore, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by
8
and between the parties hereto through their attorneys that this action be dismissed in its entirety.
9
Except as specifically stated in the parties’ settlement agreement and this Court’s order, each side
10
shall bear its own fees and costs.
11
12
13
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 29, 2018
/s/ Matthew C. Helland___
Matthew C. Helland
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: December 29, 2018
/s/ Michael L. Ludwig ___
Michael L. Ludwig
Attorneys for Defendant
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 136) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this
3
matter is DISMISSED in its entirety, with each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of
4
the Court is directed to close this case.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: December 29, 2018
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?