McKeen-Chaplin v. Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.

Filing 15

AMENDED ORDER amending #14 Order signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/18/2013 ORDERING that the parties' proposed briefing schedule concerning the three referenced motions is ADOPTED, as follows: Plaintiff's motion for conditional class certification under the FLSA and Defendant's motion to deny supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims shall be filed no later than 5/20/2013; Plaintiff's motion for class certification of her state law claims shall be filed no later than 7/22/2013. These motions shall be noticed for hearing on the earliest available regularly scheduled law and motion hearing dates. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 7 GINA MCKEEN-CHAPLIN, individually, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public, 8 Plaintiffs, 9 10 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. 11 PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB, and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 12 Defendants. ________________________________ 2:12-cv-03035-GEB-JFM AMENDED ORDER 13 Page 2, lines 19 through 25 of the Order filed March 11, 2013, 14 15 (ECF No. 14) is amended as follows: 16 The parties’ proposed briefing schedule concerning the three 17 referenced motions is adopted, as follows: Plaintiff’s motion for 18 conditional class certification under the FLSA and Defendant’s motion to 19 deny supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims shall 20 be filed no later than May 20, 2013; Plaintiff’s motion for class 21 certification of her state law claims shall be filed no later than July 22 22, 2013. These motions shall be noticed for hearing on the earliest 23 available regularly scheduled law and motion hearing dates. 24 Dated: March 18, 2013 25 26 27 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?