McKeen-Chaplin v. Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.

Filing 84

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/16/15. The Clerk is directed to substitute the redacted Exhibit 1 in place of the exhibit filed on 3/2/15. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

GINA MCKEEN-CHAPLIN,
individually, on behalf of
other similarly situated, and
on behalf of the general
public,

14

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF
COURT TO SUBSTITUTE A REDACTED
EXHIBIT IN PLACE OF AN
UNREDACTED EXHIBIT

Plaintiff,

15
16

No. 2:12-CV-03035-GEB-AC

v.
PROVIDENT SAVINGS BANK, FSB,

17

Defendant.

18
On

19

March

13,

2015

Provident

filed

a

request

that

20

electronic access be blocked to its filing that contains more

21

than just the last four digits of tax identification numbers.

22

Provident states this information was inadvertently “attached to

23

Exhibit 1 to Provident’s Request for Judicial Notice In Support

24

of Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

25

(ECF

26

Exhibit 1 to Provident’s Request for Judicial Notice is attached

27

to Provident’s request and filed as ECF No. 82-2.

28

No.

77-2).”

(ECF

No.

82.)

A

proposed

redacted

copy

of

Since Provident should have complied with Federal Rule
1

1

of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), its request is GRANTED. The Clerk of

2

the Court shall substitute the redacted Exhibit 1 filed as ECF

3

No. 82-2 in place of Exhibit 1 that is attached to the Request

4

for Judicial Notice filed on March 2, 2015, which is filed as ECF

5

No. 77-2.

6

Dated:

March 16, 2015

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2