Cedarville Rancheria v. Cedarville County Water District
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/22/2013 DENYING parties' 23 Joint Request for Court to approve extension of deadling for filing rebuttals of Expert Witness Disclosures. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CEDARVILLE RANCHERIA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. CIV. S-12-3046 LKK/CMK
v.
ORDER
CEDARVILLE COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT, DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,
16
Defendants.
17
The parties have filed a “Joint Request” to approve their
18
19
stipulation extending the deadline for filing rebuttals to expert
20
witness disclosures by thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 23.)
21
The Joint Request does not show good cause for the court to
22
alter, or permit exceptions to, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling)
23
Conference Order (“Scheduling Order”) of March 13, 2013.
If the parties wish to make informal arrangements regarding
24
25
discovery deadlines, they are free to do so. However, any such
26
consensual modifications to the Scheduling Order will not be
27
enforced by the court.
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, the Joint Request is DENIED.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATED:
November 22, 2013.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?