Cedarville Rancheria v. Cedarville County Water District

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/22/2013 DENYING parties' 23 Joint Request for Court to approve extension of deadling for filing rebuttals of Expert Witness Disclosures. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CEDARVILLE RANCHERIA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. CIV. S-12-3046 LKK/CMK

v.

ORDER

CEDARVILLE COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT, DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,

16

Defendants.

17
The parties have filed a “Joint Request” to approve their

18
19

stipulation extending the deadline for filing rebuttals to expert

20

witness disclosures by thirty (30) days. (ECF No. 23.)

21

The Joint Request does not show good cause for the court to

22

alter, or permit exceptions to, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling)

23

Conference Order (“Scheduling Order”) of March 13, 2013.
If the parties wish to make informal arrangements regarding

24
25

discovery deadlines, they are free to do so. However, any such

26

consensual modifications to the Scheduling Order will not be

27

enforced by the court.

28

////
1

1

Accordingly, the Joint Request is DENIED.

2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3

DATED:

November 22, 2013.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2