Cedarville Rancheria v. Cedarville County Water District

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/7/2015 RESETTING the Final Pretrial Conference for 4/10/2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING the parties to file a joint pretrial statement by 4/3/2015; RESETTING the Jury Trial for 5/18/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WILLIAM J. THOMAS, Bar No. 67798 william.thomas@bbklaw.com SAMUEL L. EMERSON, Bar No. 222783 samuel.emerson@bbklaw.com JOSHUA A. NELSON, Bar No. 260803 Joshua.nelson@bbklaw.com Best Best & Krieger LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 325-4000 Facsimile: (916) 325-4010 Attorneys for Defendant Cedarville County Water District 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 CEDARVILLE RANCHERIA, 13 Case No. 2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR NINETY DAYS; ORDER CEDARVILLE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND TO ALL PARTIES TO THE 21 WRITTEN ACTION: Samuel L. Emerson of Best Best & Krieger LLP and Jack Duran of 22 Duran Law Office, hereby file this application to this Honorable Court requesting its approval of 23 the parties’ stipulation to a ninety (90) day extension of the trial and pretrial conference scheduled 24 in the above-entitled action, on the following grounds: 25 Plaintiff and Defendant are currently in settlement negotiations and have a draft settlement 26 agreement which is close to final. Defendant is a public entity and any settlement must be 27 approved by the District Board at its next meeting. Both Counsels request additional time to 28 finalize settlement of this matter and avoid additional costs. 82887.00001\9496863.1 1 2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE STIPULATION 1 WHEREFORE, Samuel L. Emerson of Best Best & Krieger LLP and Jack Duran of 2 Duran Law Office respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant the instant application and 3 approve the joint stipulation continuing the trial and pretrial conference for ninety (90) days. 4 5 Dated: January 6, 2015 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 6 7 By: 8 9 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 10 _/s/ Samuel L. Emerson____ SAMUEL L. EMERSON Attorney for Defendant Cedarville County Water District Best Best & Krieger retains the original document with signatures 11 DURAN LAW OFFICE 12 13 By: 14 15 _/s/ Jack Duran_ JACK DURAN Attorney for Plaintiff Cedarville Rancheria _s 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 82887.00001\9496863.1 -2- 2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE STIPULATION 1 ORDER 2 3 On January 6, 2015, Samuel L. Emerson of Best Best & Krieger LLP and Jack Duran of 4 Duran Law Office filed a request to continue the pretrial conference and trial in the above- 5 captioned matter for ninety (90) days. The application asks the Court to approve a stipulation 6 between the parties and continue the pretrial conference and trial in the above-captioned matter 7 for ninety (90) days. Good cause appearing as the basis of the request, the request is hereby 8 GRANTED. 9 LAW OFFICES OF BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP 500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 10 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the pretrial conference is reset to April 10, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. The parties joint pretrial statement shall be filed on or before April 3, 2015. Jury trial is reset to May 18, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED 14 Dated this 7th day of January, 2015 15 16 /s/ John A. Mendez_______________________ JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 82887.00001\9496863.1 -3- 2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE STIPULATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?