Cedarville Rancheria v. Cedarville County Water District
Filing
36
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/7/2015 RESETTING the Final Pretrial Conference for 4/10/2015 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez; ORDERING the parties to file a joint pretrial statement by 4/3/2015; RESETTING the Jury Trial for 5/18/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before Judge John A. Mendez. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WILLIAM J. THOMAS, Bar No. 67798
william.thomas@bbklaw.com
SAMUEL L. EMERSON, Bar No. 222783
samuel.emerson@bbklaw.com
JOSHUA A. NELSON, Bar No. 260803
Joshua.nelson@bbklaw.com
Best Best & Krieger LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 325-4000
Facsimile: (916) 325-4010
Attorneys for Defendant
Cedarville County Water District
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
CEDARVILLE RANCHERIA,
13
Case No. 2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL
AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE FOR
NINETY DAYS; ORDER
CEDARVILLE COUNTY WATER
DISTRICT,
16
Defendant.
17
18
19
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA AND TO ALL PARTIES TO THE
21
WRITTEN ACTION: Samuel L. Emerson of Best Best & Krieger LLP and Jack Duran of
22
Duran Law Office, hereby file this application to this Honorable Court requesting its approval of
23
the parties’ stipulation to a ninety (90) day extension of the trial and pretrial conference scheduled
24
in the above-entitled action, on the following grounds:
25
Plaintiff and Defendant are currently in settlement negotiations and have a draft settlement
26
agreement which is close to final. Defendant is a public entity and any settlement must be
27
approved by the District Board at its next meeting. Both Counsels request additional time to
28
finalize settlement of this matter and avoid additional costs.
82887.00001\9496863.1
1
2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK
JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE
STIPULATION
1
WHEREFORE, Samuel L. Emerson of Best Best & Krieger LLP and Jack Duran of
2
Duran Law Office respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant the instant application and
3
approve the joint stipulation continuing the trial and pretrial conference for ninety (90) days.
4
5
Dated: January 6, 2015
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
6
7
By:
8
9
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
10
_/s/ Samuel L. Emerson____
SAMUEL L. EMERSON
Attorney for Defendant
Cedarville County Water District
Best Best & Krieger retains the original
document with signatures
11
DURAN LAW OFFICE
12
13
By:
14
15
_/s/ Jack Duran_
JACK DURAN
Attorney for Plaintiff
Cedarville Rancheria
_s
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82887.00001\9496863.1
-2-
2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK
JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE
STIPULATION
1
ORDER
2
3
On January 6, 2015, Samuel L. Emerson of Best Best & Krieger LLP and Jack Duran of
4
Duran Law Office filed a request to continue the pretrial conference and trial in the above-
5
captioned matter for ninety (90) days. The application asks the Court to approve a stipulation
6
between the parties and continue the pretrial conference and trial in the above-captioned matter
7
for ninety (90) days. Good cause appearing as the basis of the request, the request is hereby
8
GRANTED.
9
LAW OFFICES OF
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
500 CAPITOL MALL, SUITE 1700
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814
10
11
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the pretrial conference is reset to April 10, 2015 at
11:00 a.m. The parties joint pretrial statement shall be filed on or before April 3, 2015.
Jury trial is reset to May 18, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED
14
Dated this 7th day of January, 2015
15
16
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
82887.00001\9496863.1
-3-
2:12-CV-03046-JAM-CMK
JOINT REQUEST TO APPROVE
STIPULATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?