Washington v. Essex et al

Filing 109

ORDER ADOPTING 98 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/26/18 DENYING without prejudice 94 95 Motions for Injunctive Relief. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON, 12 No. 2:12-cv-3054 JAM DB P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 C. ESSEX, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 23, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 20 21 which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 98.) Neither 23 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 25 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2018 (ECF No. 98), are adopted 3 4 5 in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 94, 95) are denied without prejudice. 6 7 8 9 DATED: April 26, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?