Washington v. Essex et al
Filing
109
ORDER ADOPTING 98 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 04/26/18 DENYING without prejudice 94 95 Motions for Injunctive Relief. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON,
12
No. 2:12-cv-3054 JAM DB P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
C. ESSEX, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights
18
action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On January 23, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
20
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 98.) Neither
23
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 23, 2018 (ECF No. 98), are adopted
3
4
5
in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 94, 95) are denied without
prejudice.
6
7
8
9
DATED: April 26, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
_____
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?