Washington v. Essex et al

Filing 113

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/30/2018 ADOPTING 105 findings and recommendations in full. Plaintiff's 100 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

TRACYE BENARD WASHINGTON,

5

No. 2:12-cv-3054 JAM DB P

Plaintiff,

6

v.

7

C. ESSEX, et al.,

8

ORDER

Defendants.

9
10

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

11

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

12

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On April 5, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

13
14

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

15

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 105.) Neither

16

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

17
18

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

19

ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2018 (ECF No. 105), are adopted in

20
21
22

full;
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (ECF No. 100) is denied.

23
24
25
26

DATED: May 30, 2018
/s/ John A. Mendez____________

_____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28
1