Cofield v. Unknown

Filing 13

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/8/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign aUnited States District Judge to this case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

VINCENT E. COFIELD,
Plaintiff,

ORDER AND
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

vs.

12
13

No. 2:12-cv-3060 EFB P

Defendant.

11

UNKNOWN,

14

/
15
16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28

18

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On March 5, 2013, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to

19

amend. The dismissal order explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file

20

an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an

21

amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The 30-day

22

period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to

23

the court’s order.

24

////

25

////

26

////
1

1
2
3
4

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court randomly assign a
United States District Judge to this case.
Further, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED. Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b); E. D. Cal. Local Rule 110, 183(b).

5

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

6

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

7

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

8

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

9

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections

10

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Turner v.

11

Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

12

Dated: April 8, 2013.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2