Hernandez v. W. Sacramento Police Dept et al

Filing 77

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/29/15 ordering that within 30 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STACY PAUL HERNANDEZ, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:12-cv-3065 AC P Plaintiff, v. WEST SACRAMENTO POLICE DEPT., et al., ORDER Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. ยง 1983. On September 26, 2014, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. ECF 20 No. 74. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 21 ORDERED that, within thirty days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve 22 an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of non-opposition. Failure to 23 comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without 24 prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 25 DATED: January 29, 2015 26 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?