Davis v. Hollins Law

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/16/2013 ORDERING plaintiff to file, no later than 4:30 p.m. on 8/19/13, a response to defendant's statement of undisputed facts which satisfies the requirements of Local Rule 260(b). (Donati, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MICHAEL DAVIS,

11

Plaintiff,
NO. CIV. S-12-3107 LKK/GGH

12
13

v.
HOLLINS LAW, A PROFESSIONAL
CORPORATION,

O R D E R

14
Defendant.
/

15
16

Defendant Hollins Law has filed a motion for summary judgment.

17

(ECF No. 35.) This motion was originally scheduled to be heard on

18

August 26, 2013, but was continued by court order until September

19

9, 2013. (ECF No. 42.)

20

On

August

12,

2013,

plaintiff

Michael

Davis

filed

an

21

opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment, as well as

22

a cross-motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 43.)

23
24

As

required

by

Local

Rule

260(a),

defendant

included

a

Statement of Undisputed Facts with its motion. (ECF No. 36.)

25

Local Rule 260(b) requires “[a]ny party opposing a motion for

26

summary judgment . . . [to] reproduce the itemized facts in the
1

1

Statement of Undisputed Facts and admit those facts that are

2

undisputed and deny those that are disputed, including with each

3

denial a citation to the particular portions of any pleading,

4

affidavit, deposition, interrogatory answer, admission, or other

5

document relied upon in support of that denial.” It appears that

6

plaintiff has failed to satisfy this requirement in its filings to

7

date.

8

Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to file, no

9

later than 4:30 p.m. on August 19, 2013, a response to defendant’s

10

Statement of Undisputed Facts which satisfies the requirements of

11

Local Rule 260(b).

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

DATED:

August 16, 2013.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2