Greene v. People of the State of California
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/13 ORDERING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DARIN D. GREENE,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-03115 DAD P
v.
ORDER
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
16
Respondents.
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
18
19
Petitioner has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
20
636(c). (See ECF No. 5.)
By order filed September 17, 2013, petitioner was directed to file a new application to
21
22
proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee in connection with this habeas action
23
within thirty days and was cautioned that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this
24
action. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
order, has not filed a new application to proceed in forma pauperis or submitted the filing fee.
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
3
Dated: October 30, 2013
4
5
6
7
8
DAD:4
gree3115.fpf.hab
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?