Greene v. People of the State of California

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/30/13 ORDERING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DARIN D. GREENE,

12

Petitioner,

13
14
15

No. 2:12-cv-03115 DAD P

v.

ORDER

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, et al.,

16

Respondents.

17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

18
19

Petitioner has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

636(c). (See ECF No. 5.)
By order filed September 17, 2013, petitioner was directed to file a new application to

21
22

proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee in connection with this habeas action

23

within thirty days and was cautioned that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this

24

action. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

order, has not filed a new application to proceed in forma pauperis or submitted the filing fee.

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

3

Dated: October 30, 2013

4
5
6
7
8

DAD:4
gree3115.fpf.hab

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2