United States of America v. Approximately $35,000.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 4

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/12/2012 ORDERING 3 the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be EXTENDED to 5/14/2012. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 3 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 Attorneys for the United States 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 APPROXIMATELY $35,000.00 in 15 U.S. CURRENCY, 16 Defendant. _____________________________ _ ) 2:12-MC-00013-GEB-GGH ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER ) EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING ) A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE ) AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ) ALLEGING FORFEITURE ) ) ) ) _ ) 17 18 It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and 19 Claimant Edwin Movagharian ("Claimant"), by and through his respective attorney, 20 as follows: 21 1. On or about November 29, 2011, Claimant filed a claim, in the administrative 22 forfeiture proceedings, with the Drug Enforcement Administration with respect to the 23 Approximately $35,000.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter the "defendant currency"), 24 which was seized on September 2, 2011. 25 2. The Drug Enforcement Administration has sent the written notice of intent 26 to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time 27 has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. § 28 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time 1 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than Claimant have filed a claim to the defendant 2 currency as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding. 3 3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a 4 complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment 5 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture within ninety days after 6 a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court 7 extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That 8 deadline was originally February 27, 2012. 9 4. By Stipulation and Order filed February 28, 2012, the parties stipulated to 10 extend to April 12, 2012, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil 11 complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment 12 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture. 13 5. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to 14 further extend to May 14, 2012, the time in which the United States is required to file 15 a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an 16 indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture. 17 6. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States 18 shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time 1 and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to 2 forfeiture shall be extended to May 14, 2012. 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 5 DATE: 4/12/2012 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney DATE: 4/12/2012 /s/ Janet Sherman JANET SHERMAN Attorney for Claimant Edwin Movagharian 6 7 8 9 10 (Authorized by email) 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: April 12, 2012 16 17 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?