Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. v. Soukup
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/21/2012 MODIFYING 3 Order denying Motion to Quash; ORDERING Defendant to serve a copy of this order on the subpoenaed entity. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
SERVICES, INC.,
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2:12-mc-0053 LKK CKD
12
vs.
13
KIMBERLEY SOUKUP,
14
Defendant.
15
ORDER
/
16
Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to reconsider this court’s order
17
denying a motion to quash a subpoena directed to the custodian of records for Facebook, Inc.
18
Defendant contends that the documents sought by the subpoena will divulge to plaintiff attorney-
19
client communications. Upon review of the motion for reconsideration, and good appearing
20
therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
21
The August 13, 2012 order denying the motion to quash is modified as follows:
22
All documents produced pursuant to the subpoena at issue shall be provided for inspection to
23
defense counsel prior to production to plaintiff. All such documents shall be Bates-stamped,
24
with costs associated therewith billed to defendant. Upon inspection of the subpoenaed
25
documents, defendant may, within fourteen days of provision of the documents by the
26
subpoenaed entity, designate documents to be withheld on the basis of attorney-client privilege
1
1
and shall provide a privilege log identifying the Bates number of the documents and date of the
2
communication. All documents that are not identified on the privilege log shall be produced to
3
plaintiff. Defendant shall serve a copy of this order on the subpoenaed entity.
4
Dated: August 21, 2012
5
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
4 sedgwick-soukup.rec
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?