Smith v. County of Los Angeles, et al.,

Filing 7

PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/5/2012 DISCHARGING 3 Order to Show Cause. (Michel, G)

1 ROBERT MANN, CSB 48293
DONALD W. COOK, CSB 116666

2 ATTORNEYS AT LAW

3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2900

3 Los Angeles, CA 90010
Phone: [phone]

4 Fax: [phone]
5
6

E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

7
8

U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT

9

E ASTERN D ISTRICT OF C ALIFORNIA

10
11

REGINALD LENARD SMITH,
individually and as a class representative,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

No. 2:12-mc-0063 JAM CKD
(Central District of California
No. CV11-10666 GAF (PJWx))

Plaintiff,
vs.

PROTECTIVE ORDER

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS
ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, CITY OF LOS
ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE
DEPARTMENT, LEE BACA, DOES 1
through 10, both their personal and
official capacities,
Defendants.

20
21
22

The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiff and non-party State of

23 California (“State”) as well as Plaintiff’s offer of good cause and materiality, hereby
24
orders as follows:
25
1. The State is order to comply with the subpoena issued July 26, 2012 and its
26
request for production of items or information, to the extent such items or information is
27
reasonably available;
28
-1-

smith-la.mc63.po.wpd

1

2. Any criminal history information as defined by California Penal Code §

2 11105(a)(2), regarding any person other than Plaintiff Reginald Lenard Smith and
3 provided by the State pursuant to the subpoena, shall be restricted in its use and
4 dissemination as follows:
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

A. The information shall be disclosed to the Court hearing this matter, the
parties’ attorneys, investigators and/or consultants or experts, and no other person;
B. If any party wishes to disclose items or information covered by this
protective order to any person other than those listed in Paragraph 2(A), that party
shall give written notice to counsel for the California Department of Justice so that
the Department can make a motion to prevent the disclosure. The party wishing

12

to disclose the information will not to do so unless and until agreement with the

13

Department is reached, or the Department’s motion is ruled on by the court. If

14

however, the Department, does not file its motion within two weeks of the notice,

15

the party wishing to disclose the information may deem the issue to have been

16

abandoned.

17

3. The Order to Show Cause issued August 16, 2012 is hereby DISCHARGED.

18 The deposition shall go forward pursuant to the terms of this order, at a time and place
19 mutually agreeable by counsel for Plaintiff and the deponent.
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23
24

Dated: September 5, 2012
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
-2-

smith-la.mc63.po.wpd