Smith v. County of Los Angeles, et al.,

Filing 7

PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/5/2012 DISCHARGING 3 Order to Show Cause. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 ROBERT MANN, CSB 48293 DONALD W. COOK, CSB 116666 2 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2900 3 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Phone: (213) 252-9444 4 Fax: (213) 252 0091 5 6 E-mail: Attorneys for Plaintiff 7 8 U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT 9 E ASTERN D ISTRICT OF C ALIFORNIA 10 11 REGINALD LENARD SMITH, individually and as a class representative, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 No. 2:12-mc-0063 JAM CKD (Central District of California No. CV11-10666 GAF (PJWx)) Plaintiff, vs. PROTECTIVE ORDER COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, LEE BACA, DOES 1 through 10, both their personal and official capacities, Defendants. 20 21 22 The Court, having reviewed the stipulation of Plaintiff and non-party State of 23 California (“State”) as well as Plaintiff’s offer of good cause and materiality, hereby 24 orders as follows: 25 1. The State is order to comply with the subpoena issued July 26, 2012 and its 26 request for production of items or information, to the extent such items or information is 27 reasonably available; 28 -1- smith-la.mc63.po.wpd 1 2. Any criminal history information as defined by California Penal Code § 2 11105(a)(2), regarding any person other than Plaintiff Reginald Lenard Smith and 3 provided by the State pursuant to the subpoena, shall be restricted in its use and 4 dissemination as follows: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 A. The information shall be disclosed to the Court hearing this matter, the parties’ attorneys, investigators and/or consultants or experts, and no other person; B. If any party wishes to disclose items or information covered by this protective order to any person other than those listed in Paragraph 2(A), that party shall give written notice to counsel for the California Department of Justice so that the Department can make a motion to prevent the disclosure. The party wishing 12 to disclose the information will not to do so unless and until agreement with the 13 Department is reached, or the Department’s motion is ruled on by the court. If 14 however, the Department, does not file its motion within two weeks of the notice, 15 the party wishing to disclose the information may deem the issue to have been 16 abandoned. 17 3. The Order to Show Cause issued August 16, 2012 is hereby DISCHARGED. 18 The deposition shall go forward pursuant to the terms of this order, at a time and place 19 mutually agreeable by counsel for Plaintiff and the deponent. 20 IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 24 Dated: September 5, 2012 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28 -2- smith-la.mc63.po.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?