Gier v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/10/14 GRANTING 32 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $3,250.00, as authorized by 28 USC Section 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8956 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Carolyn.Chen@ssa.gov 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 DONALD GIER, ) Plaintiff, ) 14 v. ) 15 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ) ) 16 Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) 17 Defendant. ) ______________________________) 18 Case No. 2:13-CV-00012-KJN STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTLING ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 19 20 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, 21 subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to 22 Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED 23 FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/100 CENTS ($3,250.00). This amount represents compensation for all 24 legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance 25 with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d). After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider the 26 27 matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Ratliff v. Astrue, 130 S. 28 Ct. 2521 (U.S. June 14, 2010) the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees are 1 1 subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. 2 After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any 3 offset. 4 Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that 5 Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees to be made 6 directly to Plaintiff’s attorney Jesse Kaplan, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any 7 payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 8 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees 9 and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of 10 the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff 11 and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this action. 12 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act 13 attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA. 14 15 Respectfully submitted, 16 Date: April 10, 2014 s/ Jesse S. Kaplan (As authorized by email on 4/9/2014) JESSE S. KAPLAN Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Date: April 10, 2014 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By s/ Carolyn B. Chen CAROLYN B. CHEN Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 25 26 27 28 2 1 2 3 ORDER 4 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees 5 in the amount of THREE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS 6 ($3,250.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced 7 Stipulation. 8 9 10 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. This order resolves docket number 32. 11 12 Dated: April 10, 2014 13 14 15 16 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?