Savoy v. Schlachter
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/19/13. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERWIN SAVOY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0014 JAM AC P
v.
ORDER
STAN SCHLACHTER,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has
18
ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983
19
cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional
20
circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
21
1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900
22
F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required
23
exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be
24
denied.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of
25
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
counsel (ECF No. 35) is denied.
2
DATED: November 19, 2013
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?