Savoy v. Schlachter
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING 28 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 11/25/2013. Defendant's 19 Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for More Definite Statement is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ERWIN SAVOY,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0014 JAM AC P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
STAN SCHLACHTER,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On September 19, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed September 19, 2013, are adopted in full;
28
2. The defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a more definite statement
1
1
(ECF No. 19) is denied.
2
3
4
DATED: November 25, 2013
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?