EMBLA, LLC v. Rouf et al

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/27/13 ADOPTING IN FULL 5 Findings and Recommendations and REMANDING CASE to Sacramento County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EMBLA, LLC,
Plaintiff,

11
vs.

12
13

MOHAMMAD A. ROUF, et al.,
Defendant.

14
15

No. 2:13-cv-0020 LKK GGH PS

ORDER

__________________________________/

16

On January 10, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

17

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

18

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.

19
20

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

21

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

22

1983).

23
24
25
26

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed
January 10, 2013, are ADOPTED and
1

1

1. This action is remanded to Sacramento County Superior Court;

2

2. The Clerk is directed to serve a certified copy of this order on the Clerk of the

3

Sacramento County Superior Court, and reference the state case number (12UD09538) in the

4

proof of service; and

5
6

3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DATED: February 27, 2013.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2