Estate of Mark Anthony Scott et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 3/20/14 ORDERING that the undersigner declines to act as a settlement conference judge in this action. However, should the parties desire to schedule a settlement conference before a magistrate judge, they are hereby authorized to contact the Courtroom Deputy assigned to the magistrate judge of their choice for the purpose of attempting to schedule a mutually convenient date and time to conduct a settlement conference. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7
8
9
10
11

Estate of MARK ANTHONY SCOTT,
deceased, by and through MARY
SCOTT, TINA SCOTT, REGINA
ALLEN, and KIM NZIBO as
Successors in Interest; MARY
SCOTT, individually; TINA
SCOTT, individually; REGINA
ALLEN, individually; and KIM
NZIBO, individually,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

No. 2:13-cv-0024-GEB-KJN

ORDER

Plaintiffs,
v.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Department Sheriff SCOTT
JONES; Sacramento County Main
Jail Commander Captain
ROSEANNE RICHAEL; Sacramento
County Sheriff’s Department
Chief of Correctional and
Court Services JAMIE LEWIS;
Sacramento County Main Jail
Chief of Correctional Health
Services AARON BREWER;
Sacramento County Jail
Systems Medical Director
ROBERT PADILLA, MD;
Sacramento County Main Jail
Director of Nursing with
Correctional Health Services
PAM HARRIS; Sacramento County
Main Jail Watch Commander,
Lieutenant GEORGE McKEEL
(#11); Sacramento County
Sheriff’s Department Deputy
JAMES TIDWELL (#897);
Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Deputy DAVID PANTOJA (#2615);
Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Department Deputy KEN BECKER
1

1
2
3
4
5

(#931); Sacramento County
Sheriff’s Department Deputy
MICHAEL MATRANGA (#572);
Sacramento County Sheriff’s
Department Sergeant MICHAEL,
XIONG (#71); Sacramento
County Sheriff’s Department
Sergeant SCOTT HUFFORD (#41);
and CARYL SKERRITT, RN,
Defendants*.

6
7
8

On March 13, 2014, the parties filed a joint “Request

9

for Settlement Conference in Trial Court,” (ECF No. 32), in which

10

they request a settlement conference be scheduled with the trial

11

judge.

12

I decline to act as a settlement conference judge in

13

this action. However, should the parties desire to schedule a

14

settlement conference before a magistrate judge, they are hereby

15

authorized

16

magistrate judge of their choice for the purpose of attempting to

17

schedule

18

settlement conference.

19

Dated:

a

to

contact

mutually

the

Courtroom

convenient

date

Deputy

and

assigned

time

to

to

the

conduct

a

March 20, 2014

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
*

28

The caption has been amended according to the automatic dismissal of Doe
Defendants. See Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order 2:16-22, ECF No. 24.

2