Estate of Mark Anthony Scott et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/16/14: The expert witness disclosure cut-off date currently set for August 8, 2014 is moved to September 19, 2014. (Kaminski, H)

2
3

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: [phone]

LONGYEAR, O’DEA, & LAVRA, LLP
VAN LONGYEAR, SBN 84189
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]

Attorney for Plaintiffs

1

Attorneys for Defendant
CARYL SKERITT, RN

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
JESSE M. RIVERA, SBN 84259
SHANAN L. HEWITT, SBN 200168
JONATHAN B. PAUL, SBN 215884
2180 Harvard Street, Suite 310
Sacramento, CA 95815
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT
JONES, ROSEANNE RICHAEL, JAMIE
LEWIS, AARON BREWER, ROBERT
PADILLA, MD, PAM HARRIS, GEORGE
McKEEL, JAMES TIDWELL, DAVID
PANTOJA, KEN BECKER, MICHAEL
MATRANGA, MICHAEL XIONG, and
SCOTT HUFFORD

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

Estate of MARK ANTHONY SCOTT, et al.,

20

NO. 2:13-CV-00024-GEB-KJN

Plaintiffs,

21
vs.

22
23

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

24

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE
EXPERT WITNESSES

Defendants.
___________________________________/

25
26

///

27

///

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES
1

1

COME NOW THE PARTIES, by and through their respective attorneys and subject

2

to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following

3

modification and/or amendment to this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of March 28, 2013

4

(Docket #24), amended on April 8, 2014 (Docket #34) regarding the scheduling of this case:

5



That the expert witness disclosure cut-off date currently set for August 8, 2014 be

6

moved to September 19, 2014, and any supplemental disclosures be due within 30

7

days following.

8

This calendaring modification is requested because although the parties have been

9

cooperatively engaging in the discovery process, there are still numerous depositions which

10

need to be conducted prior to the experts being in a position to prepare their reports.

11

Additionally, the fact that there are three sets of attorneys involved has made it somewhat

12

more difficult to schedule depositions despite the parties’ cooperative spirit. Furthermore,

13

these depositions will put the parties in a better position to see which claims can be

14

eliminated prior to the filing of any dispositive motions.

15
16

The parties do not expect to change any of the other dates currently scheduled in this
case.

17
18

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

19
20

Dated: July 16, 2014

21

/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorney for Plaintiffs

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ

Dated: July 16, 2014

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
/s/ Van Longyear
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorneys for Defendant
CARYL SKERITT, RN

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES
2

1

Dated: July 16, 2014

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES

2
/s/ Jesse M. Rivera
JESSE M. RIVERA
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT
JONES, ROSEANNE RICHAEL, JAMIE
LEWIS, AARON BREWER, ROBERT
PADILLA, MD, PAM HARRIS, GEORGE
McKEEL, JAMES TIDWELL, DAVID
PANTOJA, KEN BECKER, MICHAEL
MATRANGA, MICHAEL XIONG, and
SCOTT HUFFORD

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED:

14

Dated: July 16, 2014

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES
3