Estate of Mark Anthony Scott et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/26/2014 ORDERING the parties to disclose expert witnesses by 9/29/2014; ORDERING that any supplemental disclosures be made 30 days thereafter. (Michel, G)

2
3

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ
STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425
555 University Avenue, Suite 270
Sacramento, California 95825
Telephone: [phone]

LONGYEAR, O’DEA, & LAVRA, LLP
VAN LONGYEAR, SBN 84189
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]

Attorney for Plaintiffs

1

Attorneys for Defendant
CARYL SKERITT, RN

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
JESSE M. RIVERA, SBN 84259
SHANAN L. HEWITT, SBN 200168
JONATHAN B. PAUL, SBN 215884
2180 Harvard Street, Suite 310
Sacramento, CA 95815
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT
JONES, ROSEANNE RICHAEL, JAMIE
LEWIS, AARON BREWER, ROBERT
PADILLA, MD, PAM HARRIS, GEORGE
McKEEL, JAMES TIDWELL, DAVID
PANTOJA, KEN BECKER, MICHAEL
MATRANGA, MICHAEL XIONG, and
SCOTT HUFFORD

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18
19

Estate of MARK ANTHONY SCOTT, et al.,

20

NO. 2:13-CV-00024-GEB-KJN

Plaintiffs,

21
vs.

22
23

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

24

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE
EXPERT WITNESSES

Defendants.
___________________________________/

25
26

///

27

///

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES
1

1

COME NOW THE PARTIES, by and through their respective attorneys and subject

2

to the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following

3

modification and/or amendment to this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Order of March 28, 2013

4

(Docket #24), amended on April 8, 2014 (Docket #34), July 17, 2014 (Docket #43) and

5

September 15, 2014 (Docket #45), regarding the scheduling of this case:

6



That the expert witness disclosure cut-off date currently set for September 26, 2014

7

be moved to September 29, 2014, and any supplemental disclosures be due within 30

8

days following.

9

This calendaring modification is requested because Plaintiffs’ counsel is currently

10

still in a criminal trial (People v. Jodie Teragawa, Case No. 14F01950) that has taken two

11

days longer than previously anticipated, and it is questionable as to whether or not it will

12

finish today. Additionally, the co-worker of one of Plaintiffs’ experts is currently out sick so

13

Plaintiffs’ expert is having to do twice his usual workload.

14
15

The parties do not expect to change any of the other dates currently scheduled in this
case.

16
17

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

18
19

Dated: September 25, 2014

20

/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ,
Attorney for Plaintiffs

21
22
23
24
25
26
27

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ

Dated: September 25, 2014

LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
/s/ Van Longyear
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorneys for Defendant
CARYL SKERITT, RN

28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES
2

1
2

Dated: September 25, 2014

3

RIVERA & ASSOCIATES
/s/ Jesse M. Rivera
JESSE M. RIVERA
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SCOTT
JONES, ROSEANNE RICHAEL, JAMIE
LEWIS, AARON BREWER, ROBERT
PADILLA, MD, PAM HARRIS, GEORGE
McKEEL, JAMES TIDWELL, DAVID
PANTOJA, KEN BECKER, MICHAEL
MATRANGA, MICHAEL XIONG, and
SCOTT HUFFORD

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED:

14
15

Dated: September 26, 2014

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR ALL PARTIES TO DISCLOSE EXPERT WITNESSES
3