Davenport v. Ponce et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/16/13 ORDERING that this case is TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES BOBBY DAVENPORT, Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:13-cv-00037 DAD P PONCE, et al., 14 Defendants. ORDER / 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant 16 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has neither filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, nor paid the filing fee for this action. 19 The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a 20 judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in 21 which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or 22 omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of 23 the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as 24 provided in this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s 25 personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 26 ///// 1 1 In this case, the named defendants are located in Monterey County and plaintiff’s 2 claim arose in Monterey County. Monterey County is located within the boundaries of the 3 Northern District of California. Therefore, plaintiff’s claim should have been filed in the United 4 States District Court for the Northern District of California. In the interest of justice, a federal 5 court may transfer a complaint filed in the wrong district to the correct district. See 28 U.S.C. 6 § 1406(a); Starnes v. McGuire, 512 F.2d 918, 932 (D.C. Cir. 1974). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the 7 8 United States District Court for the Northern District of California. 9 DATED: January 16, 2013. 10 11 12 13 14 DAD:mp/4 dave0037.21a 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?