Matthes v. Solano County Detention Facilities

Filing 20

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/25/13 ORDERING the clerk assign this case to a District Judge. U.S. District Judge Troy L. Nunley randomly assigned to this case. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RICHARD MATTHEW,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:13-cv-45 AC P

v.

ORDER AND FINDINGS &
RECOMMENDATIONS

SOLANO COUNTY DETENTION
FACILITIES,
Defendant.

16
17

By order filed April 8, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend

18
19

within twenty eight days. On July 11, 2013 and September 20, 2013, plaintiff was granted two

20

additional extensions of time up to and including October 25, 2013 in which to file an amended

21

complaint. That deadline has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

22

otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk assign this case to a district

23
24
25
26
27
28

judge.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty-one days
1

1

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

2

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

3

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

4

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

5

(9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: November 25, 2013

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2