Harrington v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/30/2014 ORDERING that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,800.00) under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($350.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
BRENDA M. PULLIN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8975
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail: Brenda.Pullin@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
MICHELLE HARRINGTON,
Plaintiff,
vs.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
17
18
Defendant.
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-52-AC
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
AWARD OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND
COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees and
expenses in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND EIGHT HUNDRED DOLLARS ($5,800.00)
under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of
THREE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($350.00) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount
represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in
connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
27
28
1
1
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and costs to Plaintiff, the government will
2
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and costs to Plaintiff’s attorney.
3
Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d 91 (2010), the
4
ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and costs are subject to any
5
offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the
6
order for EAJA fees and costs is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject
7
to any offset.
8
Fees and costs shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury
9
determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the
10
payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Rick Peasley, pursuant to the
11
assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
12
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA
13
attorney fees, expenses, and costs, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
14
Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a
15
complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may
16
have relating to EAJA attorney fees, expenses, and costs in connection with this action.
17
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security
18
Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
19
20
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: June 26, 2014
By:
21
22
/s/ Rick Peasley*
RICK PEASLEY
*By email authorization on June 26, 2014
Attorney for Plaintiff
23
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
24
25
26
27
Dated: June 25, 2014
By:
/s/ Brenda M. Pullin
BRENDA M. PULLIN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
28
2
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, it is so ordered.
3
4
5
Dated: June 30, 2014
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?