Bovero v. Electrolux Home Products Incorporated
Filing
11
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/29/13: Defendant need not respond to the First Amended Complaint in light of Plaintiff's intention to file a Second Amended Complaint. This action is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930)
bwisoff@fbm.com
Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539)
tmayhew@fbm.com
Alexander M. Porcaro (State Bar No. 281185)
aporcaro@fbm.com
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
(415) 954-4400
Facsimile:
(415) 954-4480
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
ROBERT BOVERO,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
15
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS
INCORPORATED,
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION TO
THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
PURSUANT TO THE FIRST-TO-FILE
RULE AND 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a)
16
Defendant.
17
18
Plaintiff Robert Bovero (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
19
(“Defendant”) (collectively “Parties”), by and through counsel, hereby stipulate that the Court
20
may, and request that it do, (1) transfer this putative class action to the District of New Jersey for
21
coordinated or consolidated proceedings with two related putative class actions pending there,
22
and (2) extend the time for Defendant’s response until after Plaintiff files an anticipated Second
23
Amended Complaint that takes into account the District of New Jersey’s ruling on motions to
24
dismiss in the two related actions.
25
As support and background for this Stipulation, the Parties agree as follows:
26
1. On June 1, 2012, Mariusz Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-
27
03341-NLH-AMD, (the “Kuzian Action”) was filed in the United States District Court for the
28
District of New Jersey, and an amended complaint was filed on June 14, 2012. The Kuzian
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC
-1-
28594\3610474.1
1
Action, asserting claims under New Jersey law, prays for certification of a nationwide class of
2
purchasers of certain of Defendant’s refrigerator products alleging defects in the ice makers
3
contained in those products.
4
2. On May 14, 2012, Christopher Lopiccolo v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No.
5
2:12-cv-02397-ADS-ARL, (the “Lopiccolo Action”) was filed in the United States District Court
6
for the Eastern District of New York. The Lopiccolo Action, alleging claims under New York
7
law, prays for certification of a nationwide class of purchasers of certain of Defendant’s
8
refrigerator products alleging defects in the ice makers contained in those products.
9
3. On June 27, 2012, the Lopicollo Action was transferred from the Eastern District of New
10
York to the District of New Jersey pursuant to a Joint Stipulation and Consent Order dated June
11
22, 2012.
12
4. On July 11, 2012, the Honorable Noel L. Hillman of the District of New Jersey entered an
13
order consolidating the Kuzian and Lopicollo Actions for the purposes of discovery and case
14
management and ordering that the consolidated action proceed under the case number for the
15
Kuzian Action, Case No. 1:12-cv-03341-NLH-AMD.
16
5. On September 25, 2012, the plaintiffs in the Lopicollo Action filed an amended complaint
17
to add the claims of a new putative class representative, Irma Lederer, and then dismissed the
18
claims of the prior putative class representative, Christopher LoPiccolo. This amended action
19
(the “Lederer Action”), alleging claims under New York law, prays for certification of a New
20
York class of purchasers of certain of Defendant’s refrigerator products alleging defects in the ice
21
makers contained in those products.
22
6. On January 14, 2013, Robert Bovero v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Case No. 2:13-
23
cv-00087-WBS-AC, (the “Bovero Action” or “this action”) was filed in this Court, and a First
24
Amended Complaint was filed on February 28, 2013. This action, alleging claims under
25
California law, prays for certification of a California class of purchasers of certain of Defendant’s
26
refrigerator products alleging defects in the ice makers contained in those products.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC
-2-
28594\3610474.1
1
7. On February 26, 2013, pursuant to the Parties’ joint stipulation, this Court entered an
2
order extending the time for Defendant to respond to the First Amended Complaint to March 29,
3
2013.
8. On March 28, 2013, Judge Hillman entered rulings denying Defendant’s motion to
4
5
dismiss the Kuzian Action and granting in part and denying in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss
6
the Lederer Action.
7
9. The Parties agree that the Kuzian and Lederer Actions were filed before the Bovero
8
Action, and that the various actions are expected to involve overlapping or substantially similar
9
factual and legal issues.
10
10. The parties further agree that the Bovero Action might have been brought in the District
11
of New Jersey and that transferring this action to that court would promote the convenience of the
12
parties, the convenience of the witnesses, and the interests of justice.
13
11. Defendant’s primary place of business, where many of its witnesses and documents
14
would be located, is in Charlotte, North Carolina, which is closer to the District of New Jersey
15
than to this Court.
16
12. According to official Federal Court Management statistics for September 2012, found at
17
http://www.uscourts.gov/Statistics/FederalCourtManagementStatistics/district-courts-september-
18
2012.aspx, the average judge in the District of New Jersey had an active caseload of 466 pending
19
cases, compared to 1,427 pending cases per judge in this District.
20
21
13. Plaintiff herein intends to file a Second Amended Complaint whether or not this action is
transferred.
22
14. Plaintiff agrees that Defendant need not respond to the First Amended Complaint until
23
after Plaintiff files his Second Amended Complaint;
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC
-3-
28594\3610474.1
1
2
ACCORDINGLY, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE THAT:
1.
Pursuant to the first-to-file rule and 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), the Parties jointly request
3
transfer of this action to the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated
4
proceedings with the Kuzian and Lederer Actions pending there; and
5
2.
6
7
Defendant need not respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint until after
Plaintiff files his Second Amended Complaint
.
8
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
12
Dated: March 29, 2013
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
By: /s/ C. Brandon Wisoff
C. Brandon Wisoff
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant
ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INC.
15
16
17
Dated: March 29, 2013
EPPSTEINER & FIORICA ATTORNEYS, LLP
By: /s/ Stuart M. Eppsteiner
Stuart M. Eppsteiner
(as authorized on March 29, 2013)
18
19
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT BOVERO, on
behalf of himself and those similarly situated
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC
-4-
28594\3610474.1
1
2
ORDER
3
4
5
Based on the foregoing stipulation and for good cause shown,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
6
7
8
9
1.
Defendant need not respond to the First Amended Complaint in light of Plaintiff’s
intention to file a Second Amended Complaint;
2.
The court finds that under the first-to-file rule and 28 U.S.C. 1404(a), it would be
10
in the interests of the parties, witnesses, and justice to transfer the action to the United States
11
District Court for the District of New Jersey so that the parties may seek
12
coordination/consolidation with the related cases Mariusz Kuzian v. Electrolux Home Products,
13
Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-03341-NLH-AMD, and Irma Lederer v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.,
14
Case No.: 1:12-cv-03930 (NLH-AMD); and
15
3.
This action is hereby transferred to the United States District Court for the District
16
17
18
19
of New Jersey.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 29, 2013
20
_________________________________________
WILLIAM B. SHUBB
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TRANSFERRING ACTION TO D.N.J.
Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC
-5-
28594\3610474.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?