Bovero v. Electrolux Home Products Incorporated

Filing 8

STIPULATION and ORDER 6 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 2/26/2013 extending time for plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint by 3/1/2013. Defendant's response to the amended complaint shall be filed by 3/29/2013. (Kirksey Smith, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 C. Brandon Wisoff (State Bar No. 121930) bwisoff@fbm.com Thomas B. Mayhew (State Bar No. 183539) tmayhew@fbm.com FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP 235 Montgomery Street, 17th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 954-4400 Facsimile: (415) 954-4480 Attorneys for Defendant ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INCORPORATED 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EASTERN DISTRICT 10 11 ROBERT BOVERO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INCORPORATED, 15 Defendant. 16 Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT AND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (L.R. 144) Complaint served: Jan. 17, 2013 Current response date: Feb. 7, 2013 New response date: March 29, 2013 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Plaintiff ROBERT BOVERO (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INCORPORATED (“Electrolux”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, on January 16, 2013, Plaintiff filed his initial Complaint in this action; WHEREAS, on January 17, 2013, Plaintiff served Electrolux with a copy of the initial Complaint and Summons in a Civil Action; WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a), Electrolux currently must file and serve a response to Plaintiffs’ initial Complaint on or before February 7, 2013; WHEREAS, the parties have not yet obtained any extensions as to Electrolux’s time to file and serve a response to Plaintiff’s initial Complaint; 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC -1- 28594\3519267.1 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has notified Electrolux that he intends to file a First Amended 2 Complaint on or before March 1, 2013 to, at a minimum, add a claim for damages to his cause of 3 action under the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”); 4 WHEREAS, Electrolux does not wish to incur, and Plaintiff does not wish to cause 5 Electrolux to incur, any burden or expense in responding to the Complaint now on file that will be 6 superseded by the First Amended Complaint when it is filed; 7 WHEREAS, Electrolux also has requested from Plaintiff additional time to prepare a 8 response to Plaintiff’s forthcoming First Amended Complaint, which Plaintiff intends to file on or 9 before March 1, 2013; 10 WHEREAS both parties have agreed that good cause exists to extend the time for 11 Electrolux to respond to Plaintiff’s contemplated First Amended Complaint to and including 12 March 29, 2013 (28 days after Plaintiff intends to file a First Amended Complaint); 13 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE AND STIPULATE THAT (1) 14 Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint on or before March 1, 2013; (2) Electrolux need 15 not respond to the Complaint currently on file; and (3) Electrolux shall have to and including 16 March 29, 2013, to move, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 17 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 18 19 Dated: January 30, 2013 20 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP By: /s/ C. Brandon Wisoff C. Brandon Wisoff 21 Attorneys for Defendant ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS INC. 22 23 24 Dated: January 30, 2013 25 EPPSTEINER & FIORICA ATTORNEYS, LLP By: /s/ Stuart M. Eppsteiner Stuart M. Eppsteiner (as authorized on January 30, 2013) 26 27 Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT BOVERO, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC -2- 28594\3519267.1 1 2 ORDER 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: February 26, 2013 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 2:13-cv-00087-WBS-AC -3- 28594\3519267.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?