Kaur, et al., v Singh, et al.,

Filing 82

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/4/14 re 71 MOTION for DEFAULT JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs are ORDERED to submit a supplemental brief by 1/14/15, addressing the factors set forth in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986). (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KULWINDER KAUR, et al.,

12
13

No. 2:13-cv-0089-KJM-EFB

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER

14

RAKWINDER SINGH, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

On December 3, 2014, this matter was before the court for hearing on plaintiffs’ motion

18

for default judgment against defendant Cloud 9 Logistics. Attorney Philip Ganong appeared on

19

behalf of plaintiffs; attorney Grace Nguyen appeared telephonically on behalf of defendant

20

Rakwinder Singh. No appearance was made by defendant Cloud 9 Logistics.

21

For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs are ordered to submit a supplemental brief

22

by January 14, 2015, addressing the factors set for in Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72

23

(9th Cir. 1986).

24
25
26
27
28

So Ordered.
DATED: December 4, 2014.