Solomon v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER 13 signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 2/12/13: The time for Defendants County of El Dorado Sheriff's Department, Brandon Pina (sued herein as Officer Brandon Pena), and County of El Dorado to respond to plaintiff's complaint is hereby EXTENDED to 3/6/2013. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4

ANDREW T. CAULFIELD, SBN 238300
RICHARD H. CAULFIELD, SBN 50258
CAULFIELD LAW FIRM
1101 Investment Blvd., Suite 120
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Defendants County of El Dorado,
County of El Dorado Sheriff’s Department,
and Brandon Pina (sued herein as Brandon Pena)

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
PATRICK WAYNE SOLOMON,

-o0oCase No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD

11
Plaintiff,
12

v.

13

CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE; CITY OF
SOUTH LAKE TAHOE POLICE
DEPARTMENT; OFFICER J.
HERMINGHAUS, individually and in his
official capacity; COUNTY OF EL DORADO
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, OFFICER
BRANDON PENA individually and in his
official capacity; and DOES 1-10, inclusive,

14
15
16

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
RE EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EL
DORADO DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND
Hon. Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

17
Defendants.
18
______________________________________
19
20

Plaintiff Patrick Wayne Solomon (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants County of El Dorado, County

21

of El Dorado Sheriff’s Department, and Brandon Pina (sued herein as Officer Brandon Pena)

22

(collectively, “County Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as

23

follows:

24

1.

WHEREAS, the County of El Dorado has not yet been served in this case. Counsel

25

for the County Defendants has agreed to accept service by mail on behalf of the County of El

26

Dorado. Plaintiff will effectuate service on the County in this manner forthwith.

27
28

2.

WHEREAS, the Court docket currently identifies February 13, 2013 as the due date

for the responsive pleading to be filed by Defendants County of El Dorado Sheriff’s Department and
1
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME

Case No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD

1
2

Brandon Pina. (See Dckt. No. 8, 9).
3.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has agreed to an extension of time for Defendants County of El

3

Dorado Sheriff’s Department and Brandon Pina to respond to the Complaint, making those

4

Defendants’ responses due at the same time as the response is due from the County of El Dorado.

5
6

4.

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the County Defendants must answer, move,

or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or before March 6, 2013.

7

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

8

1.

9
10
11
12

The time within which Defendants County of El Dorado Sheriff’s Department and

Brandon Pina (sued herein as Officer Brandon Pena) must answer, move, or otherwise respond to
Plaintiff’s Complaint is extended from February 13, 2013 to March 6, 2013.
2.

The County of El Dorado must also answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s

Complaint on or before March 6, 2013.

13
14
15

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: February 11, 2013

CAULFIELD LAW FIRM
By:/s/ Andrew T. Caulfield
Andrew T. Caulfield

16
17

Attorneys for Defendants County of El Dorado,
County of El Dorado Sheriff’s Department, and
Brandon Pina (sued herein as Brandon Pena)

18
19
20

DATED: February 11, 2013

By: /s/ Jennifer Peterson
Jennifer Peterson, Esq.
Susan M. Leeder

21
22

Attorneys for Plaintiff Patrick Wayne Solomon

23
24

THE LAW FIRM OF LAUB & LAUB

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27

DATED: 2/12/13

_____________________________________
The Honorable Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
United States District Judge

28
2
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE EXTENSION OF TIME

Case No. 2:13-cv-00115-GEB-CKD