Stutzman et al. v. Armstrong, et al.

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/5/13 ORDERING Motion Hearings for 56 , 41 , 53 , 37 , 36 , 47 , 46 , 57 , 55 , 42 RESCHEDULED to 8/8/2013 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Chief Judge Morrison C. England Jr. The Court ORDERS the following briefing schedule as to defendants Weisel and Stapleton: Defendants Weisel and Stapleton shall file the Subject Motions, and papers in support thereof, on or before 7/18/13; Plaintiffs shall file their briefs and other papers in opposition to the Subject Motions on or before 7/25/13; and Defendants Weisel and Stapleton shall file their reply briefs and other papers in further support of the Subject Motions on or before 8/1/13. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146) 1 (sacksr@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 2 1888 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067 (310) 712-6600 Facsimile: (310) 712-8800 3 Telephone: 4 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) 5 (cullenb@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 6 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 7 Telephone: 8 9 10 Attorneys for Defendant Thomas W. Weisel (See Signature Page for Additional Parties and Counsel) 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 13 ROB STUTZMAN, JONATHAN 14 WHEELER, GLORIA LAURIA, 15 16 17 DAVID REIMERS and SCOTT ARMSTRONG, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, v. 18 LANCE ARMSTRONG; PENGUIN 19 GROUP (USA), INC.; G.P. PUTNAM’S 20 21 22 23 SONS; THE BERKLEY PUBLISHING GROUP; RANDOM HOUSE, INC.; BROADWAY BOOKS; CROWN PUBLISHING GROUP; THOMAS W. WEISEL; WILLIAM J. STAPLETON; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. Case No. 2:13-cv-00116-MCE-KJN Assigned for all purposes to the Honorable Morrison C. England Jr. STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS THOMAS W. WEISEL’S AND WILLIAM J. STAPLETON’S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 24 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Plaintiffs Rob Stutzman, Jonathan Wheeler, Gloria Lauria, David Reimers and 2 Scott Armstrong (collectively, “Plaintiffs”); and Defendant Thomas W. Weisel (“Weisel”) and 3 Defendant William J. Stapleton (“Stapleton”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby 4 stipulate and agree as follows: 5 WHEREAS, on March 7, 2013, Plaintiffs filed an 85-page First Amended Class 6 Action Complaint (the “Complaint’) adding, inter alia, two new defendants (Weisel and 7 Stapleton); and 8 WHEREAS, the Complaint asserts California common law claims for fraud and 9 deceit and negligent misrepresentation, as well as California statutory claims pursuant to the 10 Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) (Cal. Civ. Code § 1750 et seq.), the Unfair 11 Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200 et seq.), and the False Advertising Law (Cal. 12 Bus. & Prof. Code § 17500 et seq.); and 13 WHEREAS, Defendants Weisel and Stapleton executed Waivers of Service of 14 Summons for Complaint on March 27, 2013 and April 1, 2013, respectively; and 15 WHEREAS, Defendants Weisel and Stapleton each intend to file a motion to 16 dismiss pursuant to Rules 8, 9(b), and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and a 17 special motion to strike pursuant to Section 425.16 et seq. of the California Code of Civil 18 Procedure (the “Subject Motions”); and 19 WHEREAS, on March 28, 2013, the Court ordered a briefing schedule for 20 motions to dismiss and special motions to strike filed by Defendants Armstrong; Penguin Group 21 (USA), Inc.; G.P. Putnam’s Sons; The Berkley Publishing Group; Random House, Inc.; 22 Broadway Books; and Crown Publishing Group (the “Co-Defendants’ Motions”); and 23 WHEREAS, the Co-Defendants’ Motions are currently set for hearing on July 25, 24 2013; and 25 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Weisel and Stapleton have met and conferred regarding an 26 appropriate briefing schedule with respect to the Subject Motions, and all agree that for purposes 27 of judicial economy the schedule should be coordinated with the existing briefing schedule on 28 the Co-Defendants' Motion and set for hearing on the same date (subject to Court approval); and SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -2- 1 WHEREAS, pursuant to Rule 144(a) of the Local Rules of the United States 2 District Court for the Eastern District of California, Plaintiffs and Defendants Weisel and 3 Stapleton having appeared herein respectfully request that the Court approve such parties’ 4 briefing schedule for the Subject Motions; and 5 WHEREAS, this stipulation is the first extension requested by Plaintiffs, Weisel 6 and Stapleton relating to Weisel’s and Stapleton’s responses to the Complaint, is made in good 7 faith, is not made for the purpose of delay and will not prejudice any party; 8 9 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT: 1. 10 11 support thereof, on or before June 3, 2013; 2. 12 13 Plaintiffs shall file their briefs and other papers in opposition to the Subject Motions on or before June 28, 2013; and 3. 14 15 Defendants Weisel and Stapleton shall file the Subject Motions, and papers in Defendants Weisel and Stapleton shall file their reply briefs and other papers in further support of the Subject Motions on or before July 12, 2013. 4. The hearing on the Subject Motions should be set for July 25, 2013. 16 17 Dated: May 21, 2013 Respectfully submitted, 18 /s/ Kevin P. Roddy______________________ Kevin P. Roddy (SBN 128283) WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A. 19 20 21 Tracey Buck-Walsh (SBN 131254) LAW OFFICE OF TRACEY BUCK-WALSH 22 C. Tab Turner (admitted pro hac vice) TURNER & ASSOCIATES 23 Henry H. Rossbacher (SBN 060260) THE ROSSBACHER FIRM 24 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -3- 1 Dated: May 21, 2013 2 3 4 5 /s/ Robert A. Sacks______________________ Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067 Telephone: (310) 712-6600 Facsimile: (310) 712-8800 8 Brendan P. Cullen (SBN 194057) (cullenb@sullcrom.com) SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1870 Embarcadero Road Palo Alto, California 94303 Telephone: (650) 461-5600 Facsimile: (650) 461-5700 9 Attorneys for Defendant Thomas W. Weisel 6 7 10 Dated: May 21, 2013 11 12 13 14 15 /s/ Marc S. Harris______________________ Marc S. Harris (SBN 136647) William H. Forman (SBN 150477) SCHEPER KIM & HARRIS LLP One Bunker Hill 601 West Fifth Street, 12th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Attorneys for Defendant William J. Stapleton 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -4- 1 2 ORDER On the Court’s own motion, the hearing on Defendants’ Motions to Strike (ECF Nos. 36, 3 42, 47) and Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF NO. 37, 41, 46) are currently scheduled for 4 July 25, 2013, are vacated and rescheduled for August 8, 2013, at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 7. 5 Accordingly, the Court orders the following briefing schedule as to Defendants Weisel 6 and Stapleton: 7 1. 8 9 support thereof, on or before July 18, 2013; 2. 10 11 Defendants Weisel and Stapleton shall file the Subject Motions, and papers in Plaintiffs shall file their briefs and other papers in opposition to the Subject Motions on or before July 25, 2013; and 3. 12 Defendants Weisel and Stapleton shall file their reply briefs and other papers in further support of the Subject Motions on or before August 1, 2013. 13 The hearing on the Subject Motions (ECF Nos. 53, 55, 56, 57) shall be set for August 8, 2013, at 14 2:00 in Courtroom 7, to be heard with Defendants’ additional motions (ECF Nos. 36, 37, 41, 42, 15 46, 47.) 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 DATED: June 5, 2013 18 19 20 ___________________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?