Cummings v. Jeu et al

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLOYD A. CUMMINGS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-00128 DAD P v. ORDER MOON JEU, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 17 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See ECF No. 7. By order filed August 27, 2013, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty 20 21 days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On September 19, 2013 and October 22 10, 2013, plaintiff was granted additional time to file his second amended complaint. In the latter 23 order, plaintiff was ordered to file his second amended complaint on or before November 4, 2013 24 and was forewarned that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. (ECF No. 25 16.) That deadline has now passed and plaintiff has not filed his second amended complaint, or 26 otherwise responded to the court’s October 10, 2013 order. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 2 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 3 Dated: November 13, 2013 4 5 6 7 DAD:4 cumm128.fta 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?