Cummings v. Jeu et al
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
FLOYD A. CUMMINGS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-00128 DAD P
v.
ORDER
MOON JEU, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42
17
18
U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See ECF No. 7.
By order filed August 27, 2013, plaintiff’s amended complaint was dismissed and thirty
20
21
days leave to file a second amended complaint was granted. On September 19, 2013 and October
22
10, 2013, plaintiff was granted additional time to file his second amended complaint. In the latter
23
order, plaintiff was ordered to file his second amended complaint on or before November 4, 2013
24
and was forewarned that his failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this action. (ECF No.
25
16.) That deadline has now passed and plaintiff has not filed his second amended complaint, or
26
otherwise responded to the court’s October 10, 2013 order.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
2
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
3
Dated: November 13, 2013
4
5
6
7
DAD:4
cumm128.fta
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?