Lally v. Rabobank, N.A.

Filing 17

ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 3/11/13, ORDERING that Counterdefendant Jasbir Lally and her agents, representatives and all persons acting in concert or participating with her are restraining and enjoined fr om engaging in or performing directly or indirectly any and all of the acts outlined in this order. It is further ordered that in order to maintain this preliminary injunction order in effect, Rabobank continue to maintain the corporate security bond or cashiers check in the amount of $5,000.00, which was lodged with the Court on 2/21/2013 as security which the court deems proper for the payment of such cost and damages as may be suffered by any party which is found to be wrongfully restrained. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Charles L. Post, State Bar No. 160443
James Kachmar, State Bar No. 216781
weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

law corporation

400 Capitol Mall, 11th Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 916/446.1611
Attorneys for Defendant
RABOBANK, N.A.

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JASBIR LALLY,

11
12
13

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
RABOBANK, N.A., DOES 1-10,

14
law corporation

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

10

Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM.

17

Case No. 2:13-cv-00130-JAM-CKD
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION
Date:
March 4, 2013
Time:
9:45 a.m.
Courtroom: 6, 14th Floor
Judge: Hon. John A. Mendez
Complaint Filed: January 22, 2013

18

Counterclaimant Rabobank, N.A.’s (“Rabobank”) motion for preliminary

19

injunction came to be heard on March 4, 2013. The Court has considered the

20

written and oral arguments of counsel as well as the pleadings, declarations,

21

exhibits and other documentary evidence presented in the parties’ submissions at

22

or prior to the hearing.

23

Good cause appearing therefore,

24

IT IS ORDERED THAT Counterdefendant Jasbir Lally and her agents,

25

representatives and all persons acting in concert or participating with her are

26

restraining and enjoined from engaging in or performing directly or indirectly any

27

and all of the following acts:

28
{1600348.DOC;}

1

[Proposed] Order Granting Preliminary
Inunction

1

1.

Utilizing, disseminating, using, copying, transmitting or publishing any

2

of the data, information, records, files or emails which contain, are sourced from

3

or otherwise reference or exploit information concerning Rabobank’s confidential

4

business

5

Counterdefendant emailed to her personal email account from November 2012

6

through the present; and

7
8

information

2.

including,

but

not

limited

to,

the

emails

that

Providing disseminating, distributing or transferring Rabobank’s

confidential, trade secret and/or proprietary information to any third party.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT in order to maintain this preliminary injunction

10

order in effect, Rabobank continue to maintain the corporate security bond or

11

cashier’s check in the amount of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), which was

12

lodged with the Court on February 21, 2013 as security which the court deems

13

proper for the payment of such cost and damages as may be suffered by any

14

party which is found to be wrongfully restrained.

15
law corporation

weintraub tobin chediak coleman grodin

9

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 3/11/2013

/s/ John A. Mendez__________________
HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
{1600348.DOC;}

2

[Proposed] Order Granting Preliminary
Inunction