Lally v. Rabobank, N.A.

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/14 ORDERING: The court finds that in the circumstances of this case, an independent medical examination pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 is warranted. Accordingly, plaintiff shall appear for an independent medical examination, comprised of an eight-hour period of testing that will include both verbal interviewing and written examinations, to be conducted by Dr. Herbert Weissman, Ph.D., in Sacramento, on one of the following dates: Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Thursday, July 10, 2014, Tuesday, July 22, 2014, or Wednesday, July 23, 2014. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASBIR LALLY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-0130 JAM CKD v. ORDER RABOBANK, N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to submit to an 18 independent medical examination. No opposition has been filed. After review of the documents 19 in support of the motion and the pleadings in this matter and good cause appearing, THE COURT 20 FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: The court finds that in the circumstances of this case, an independent medical examination 21 22 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 is warranted. Accordingly, plaintiff shall appear 23 for an independent medical examination, comprised of an eight-hour period of testing that will 24 include both verbal interviewing and written examinations, to be conducted by Dr. Herbert 25 Weissman, Ph.D., in Sacramento, on one of the following dates: 26 Wednesday, July 9, 2014 27 Thursday, July 10, 2014 28 ///// 1 1 Tuesday, July 22, 2014, or 2 Wednesday, July 23, 2014. 3 Dated: June 17, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 4 lally.ime.oah 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?