Lally v. Rabobank, N.A.
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 6/17/14 ORDERING: The court finds that in the circumstances of this case, an independent medical examination pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 is warranted. Accordingly, plaintiff shall appear for an independent medical examination, comprised of an eight-hour period of testing that will include both verbal interviewing and written examinations, to be conducted by Dr. Herbert Weissman, Ph.D., in Sacramento, on one of the following dates: Wednesday, July 9, 2014, Thursday, July 10, 2014, Tuesday, July 22, 2014, or Wednesday, July 23, 2014. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JASBIR LALLY,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-0130 JAM CKD
v.
ORDER
RABOBANK, N.A.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to submit to an
18
independent medical examination. No opposition has been filed. After review of the documents
19
in support of the motion and the pleadings in this matter and good cause appearing, THE COURT
20
FINDS AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
The court finds that in the circumstances of this case, an independent medical examination
21
22
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 35 is warranted. Accordingly, plaintiff shall appear
23
for an independent medical examination, comprised of an eight-hour period of testing that will
24
include both verbal interviewing and written examinations, to be conducted by Dr. Herbert
25
Weissman, Ph.D., in Sacramento, on one of the following dates:
26
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
27
Thursday, July 10, 2014
28
/////
1
1
Tuesday, July 22, 2014, or
2
Wednesday, July 23, 2014.
3
Dated: June 17, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
4 lally.ime.oah
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?