Morin v. Hurliman Boat Repair et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/2/13 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States Magistrate Judge. All future documents filed in the above-captioned caseshall reference the following case number: No. Civ. S-13-0136 DAD; and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd ORDERING Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
VAN MORIN,
NO. CIV. S-13-0136 LKK/DAD
11
12
13
Plaintiff,
v.
HURLIMAN BOAT REPAIR,
et al.,
O R D E R
14
Defendants.
15
16
/
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented
17
to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.
See 28 U.S.C.
18
ยง 636(c).
19
judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve
20
the reference to the magistrate judge.
According to Local Rule 305, both the district court
21
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends
22
that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the
23
magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final
24
judgment.
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the
undersigned are VACATED.
1
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign
2
this case to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States Magistrate
3
Judge.
4
shall reference the following case number: No. Civ. S-13-0136 DAD.
5
All future documents filed in the above-captioned case
DATED:
April 2, 2013
6
/s/Lawrence K. Karlton
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON
SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
9
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case
10
for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.
11
DATED: April 2, 2013.
12
13
14
15
16
17
Ddad1\orders.consent
morin0135.consent.frm
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?