Ervin et al v. Omnicare, Inc.

Filing 52

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/7/2017 ORDERING Defendant Omnicare, Inc. to respond to the 46 Second Amended Complaint by 2/21/2017. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Jennifer B. Zargarof (SBN 204382)
[e-mail]
Aimee G. Mackay (SBN 221690)
[e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West 5th St., Suite 4000
Los Angeles, CA 90013
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
OMNICARE, INC., a corporation

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

DARLENE ERVIN,

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,

14
15

vs.

16

OMNICARE, INC., a corporation,

17
18

Defendant.

19
20

Civ. No. 2:13-cv-00146-MCE-KJN
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND
TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND
AMENDED COMPLAINT
PURSUANT TO EASTERN
DISTRICT LOCAL RULE 144(A);
ORDER THEREON

21
22

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties

23

hereto through their respective attorneys that Defendant OMNICARE, INC. may have

24

additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint.

25

Therefore, the last day for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s

26

Second Amended Complaint is Tuesday, February 21, 2017. This extension does not

27

exceed the twenty-eight (28) days allowed under Eastern District Local Rule 144(a).

28

This is the first stipulation to extend time pursuant to Local Rule 144(a) in this matter.
1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-0146-MCE-KJN

1

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

2
3

Dated: January 31, 2017

4
5

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
By: /s/ Jennifer B. Zargarof
Jennifer B. Zargarof
Aimee G. Mackay
Attorneys for Defendant
OMNICARE, INC., a corporation

6
7
8
9

THYBERGLAW

10
11
12
13
14

___________________________

By: /s/ Gregory A. Thyberg (authorized 1/31/17)
Gregory A. Thyberg
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DARLENE ERVIN

15

ORDER

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

In accordance with the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing, the
time for Defendant OMNICARE, INC. to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby
extended to February 21, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 7, 2017

24
25
26
27
28

2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT; ORDER
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-0146-MCE-KJN