Mecklenberg v. Del Rio et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 1/25/2018 GRANTING 44 Ex Parte Motion to be Relieved as Counsel. The hearing on defendant's 38 Motion to Set Aside Entry of Default and plaintiff's 40 Motion for Default Judgment is CONTINUED to 4/24/2018 at 01:30 PM. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 Stacy Mecklenberg, 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. Placerville Brewing Company, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company; and Does 1-10, Case: 2-13-cv-00149-JAM-JFM Order re: Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Request for Continuance of Pending Hearing Dates Defendants. 17 18 19 20 The Court has considered Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Motion to Be Relieved 21 as Counsel pursuant to Local Rule 182(d) and accompanying declaration. In 22 light of these documents, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY 23 ORDERED that: 24 1. The Law Firm of Potter Handy, LLP, dba the Center for Disability 25 Access be permitted to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff 26 Stacy Mecklenberg; 27 2. That the hearings on defendant’s motion to set aside entry of 28 default and Plaintiff’s motion for default judgment be continued to Declaration of Dennis Price in Support of Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Request for Continuance of Pending Hearing Dates Case: 2-13-cv-00149-JAM-JFM 1 April 24, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., and that the timing of opposition and 2 reply papers still outstanding comply with the Federal Rules of 3 Civil Procedure, Local Rules of this District and the Standing 4 Orders of the Court. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: January 25, 2018 By: /s/ JOHN A. MENDEZ United StatesDistrict Judge Hon. John A. Mendez 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Declaration of Dennis Price in Support of Ex Parte Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and Request for Continuance of Pending Hearing Dates Case: 2-13-cv-00149-JAM-JFM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?